期刊文献+

Luminal A型乳腺癌原发灶与淋巴结转移灶表型标志物差异性研究 被引量:5

Difference of biological markers between primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph node of Luminal A subtype breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的目前临床主要依据乳腺癌原发灶的分子分型制定治疗方案,而淋巴结转移与患者预后密切相关。本研究旨在探讨Luminal A型乳腺癌原发灶与腋窝淋巴结转移灶之间表型标志物的差异性表达情况。方法收集2012-03-01-2014-11-30中国医科大学附属第一医院手术治疗的70例乳腺癌患者组织标本,所有患者均经病理确诊原发灶为Luminal A型乳腺癌并伴有淋巴结转移。采用免疫组织化学方法检测70例患者对应的全部转移淋巴结ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67的表达情况,探讨原发灶与淋巴结转移灶之间表型标志物表达的差异性。结果 70例原发灶为Luminal A型乳腺癌患者中,淋巴结转移灶与原发灶表型标志物差异率为32.86%(23/70)。在原发灶与转移灶中,ER表达不一致6例,变化率为8.57%(6/70);PR表达不一致7例,变化率为10.00%(7/70);HER2表达不一致8例,变化率为11.43%(8/70);Ki-67表达不一致12例,变化率为17.14%(12/70)。区域淋巴结转移数目与原发灶和淋巴结转移灶间表型标志物的变化呈正相关,r=0.396,P=0.003;并与Ki-67(r=0.405,P=0.003)及PR(r=0.279,P=0.042)变化呈正相关。结论本研究结果提示,目前仅依据原发灶分子表型标志物制定综合治疗方案可能并不确切,需综合考虑,从而降低肿瘤异质性带来的低估风险。 OBJECTIVE At present,treatment program is mainly based on the molecular subtype of primary breast cancer.However,lymph node metastases is deeply related to prognosis.This study aims to detect the difference of biological markers between primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph node of Luminal A subtype breast cancer.METHODS Primary tumor tissue and metastatic lymph node specimens were obtained from 70 patients with Luminal A subtype breast cancer at Department of Breast Surgery,First Hospital of China Medical University,from 2012 to 2014.All metastatic axillary lymph nodes were detected by using four biomarkers including estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),HER2,and Ki-67 by immunohistochemistry.RESULTS The seventy cases of iuminalA subtype primary tumor shifted to other subtype metastatic lymph nodes with worse prognostic in 23 of 70 cases(32.86%).ER was expressed inconsistently between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node in 6 cases of these patients,the change rate was 8.57%(6/70).PR was expressed inconsistently between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node in 7 cases of these patients,the change rate was 10.00%(7/70).HER2 was expressed inconsistently between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node in8 cases,the change rate was 11.43%(8/70).Ki-67 was expressed inconsistently between the primary tumor and metastatic lymph node in 12 cases,the change rate was 17.14%(12/70).The number of metastatic lymph node has positive correlation with the change of biological markers between primary tumor and metastatic lymph node,r=0.396,P=0.003.The number of metastatic lymph node had positive correlation with the change of Ki-67 and PR index(r=0.405,P=0.003;r=0.279,P=0.042).CONCLUSIONS At present,It may be incomplete to develop a comprehensive treatment program only according to the primary tumor phenotype markers.The molecular subtypes in the metastatic nodes should be taken into account in order to reduce tumor heterogeneity risk.
作者 徐雨杰 王梦申 王翀 王墨之 于雪婷 徐莹莹 XU Yu-jie;WANG Meng-shen;WANG Chong;WANG Mo-zhi;YU Xue-ting;XU Ying-ying(Department of Breast Surgery ,First Hospital of China Medical University ,Shenyang 110001 ,P. R. China)
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第9期642-646,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 淋巴结 ER PR HER2 KI-67 breast neoplasms lymph nodes ER PR HER2 Ki-67
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献68

  • 1Dowsett M,Nielsen TO,A'Hern R,et al.Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer:recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group.J Natl Cancer Inst,2011,103 (22):1656-1664.
  • 2Gerdes J,Lemke H,Baisch H,et al.Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67.J Immunol,1984,133 (4):1710-1715.
  • 3Gudlaugsson E,Skaland I,Janssen EA,et al.Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer.Histopathology,2012,61 (6):1134-1144.
  • 4Varga Z,Diebold J,Dommann-Scherrer C,et al.How reliable is Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in grade 2 breast carcinomas?A QA study of the Swiss Working Group of Breast-and Gynecopathologists.PLoS One,2012,7 (5):e37379.
  • 5Romero Q,Bendahl PO,Klintman M,et al.Ki67 proliferation in core biopsies versus surgical samples:a model for neo-adjuvant breast cancer studies.BMC Cancer,2011,11:341.
  • 6Bai Y,Tolles J,Cheng H,et al.Quantitative assessment shows loss of antigenic epitopes as a function of pre-analytic variables.Lab Invest,2011,91 (8):1253-1261.
  • 7Arber DA.Effect of prolonged formalin fixation on the immunohistochemical reactivity of breast markers.Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol,2002,10(2):183-186.
  • 8Cattoretti G,Becker MH,Key G,et al.Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3)detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed paraffin sections.J Pathol,1992,168(4):357-363.
  • 9Zabaglo L,Salter J,Anderson H,et al.Comparative validation of the SP6 antibody to Ki67 in breast cancer.J Clin Pathol,2010,63 (9):800-804.
  • 10Yerushalmi R,Woods R,Ravdin PM,et al.Ki67 in breast cancer:prognostic and predictive potential.Lancet Oncol,2010,11 (2):174-183.

共引文献302

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部