中亚D线与欧美天然气管道工艺及自控水平差异对比

The difference analysis on gas pipeline process and automation level between Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline D and Europe & United States

为了提高中亚D线工艺及自控水平,保证管道安全、平稳、高效运行。基于国际咨询公司ILF对中亚D线工艺及自控水平提出的审查建议,从设计理念、风险评估、岗位设置原则、ESD分级、调控中心功能定位、与各国段及气源国间数据共享等方面,对比分析了中亚D线与欧美天然气管道在工艺及自控水平方面的差异,结果表明最主要的差距为设计理念。重点分析了中亚D线17个子系统在实施过程中,实际情况与设计期望值之间的偏差和解决方案,提出了相应的改进措施及建议,以期为中国天然气管道工艺及自控设计水平的提升提供参考。

In this paper, the differences of natural gas pipeline process and automation level between Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline D and Europe America were comparatively analyzed from the aspects of design concept, risk assessment, position setting principle, ESD classification, control center function orientation, data sharing with the sections in different countries and the gas source countries so as to improve the process and automation level of Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline D and ensure its safe, smooth and efficient operation. The analysis is based on the inspection suggestions which are proposed on the process and automation level of Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline D by the advanced international consulting corporation ILF. It is indicated that the greatest difference is embodied in the term of design concept. The deviation and solution between the actual value and the design expectancy in the implementation of the 17 subsystems of Trans-Asia Gas Pipeline D are emphatically analyzed. Finally, the corresponding improvement measures and suggestions were put forward. The research results can be used as reference for the improvement of domestic natural gas pipeline process and automation design level.