急诊PCI与择期PCI治疗急性心肌梗死的临床疗效

Clinical Comparison and Evaluation on Emergency PCI and Elective PCI in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction

目的探究急诊PCI与择期PCI治疗急性心肌梗死的临床疗效及预后对比。方法分析72例2016年2月—2017年10月急性心肌梗死患者,根据随机表分组。对照组采用择期PCI进行治疗;观察组采用急诊PCI治疗。比较效果。结果观察组患者急性心肌梗死临床治疗效果比对照组高,P<0.05;观察组住院时间比对照组短,P<0.05。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,P<0.05。干预后观察组左心射血分数优于对照组,P<0.05。结论急诊PCI治疗急性心肌梗死临床效果和安全性高,减少不良事件,缩短住院时间。

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and prognosis of emergency PCI and elective PCI in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Methods 72 patients with acute myocardial infarction from February 2016 to October 2017 were divided into groups according to a randomized table. The control group was treated with elective PCI; The observation group was treated with emergency PCI. The effect was compared. Results The clinical efficacy of acute myocardial infarction in observation group was higher than that in control group, P 〈0.05. The hospitalization time in observation group was shorter than that in control group, P 0.05. The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, P〈0.05. After intervention, the left ventricular ejection fraction of the observation group was better than that of the control group, P〈 0.05. Conclusion Emergency PCI for acute myocardial infarction has high clinical efficacy and safety, reduces adverse events, and shortens hospital stay.