中国式管理的合法性问题探究

Research on the Legitimacy of Chinese-style Management

自20世纪80年代中国进入转型期,学术界和企业实践者们开始反思过去将西方的管理科学视为放之四海而皆准的"圣经"式科学的适用性问题,自此关于建立与中国文化相吻合的、由中国传统哲学所指导的中国式管理问题成为管理学界"百家争鸣"式的热点问题。管理科学有无国界之分?中国式管理欠缺的仅仅是在自然科学层面上的系统化?中国式管理的本质是什么,是停留在应用层面上的为解决现实中企业效率低下或止步不前的问题应运而生,还是应该继续停留在形而上的思辨层面为管理实践中的问题提供通论式的指导,又或是中国式管理已成为应用层面上的模式化与思辨层面上的方法论相结合的代名词?以上一系列问题,呼吁我们要在对管理本土化问题进一步创新研究的基础上勿忘"初心",对于中国式管理合法性做出符合现代理念的界定,仍旧是保证管理本土化研究路径沿着正确方向前行的核心问题,是不容忽视的。中国式管理的定位问题是验证这一学术名词合法性的基础性问题,在科学属性的实证主义范式下,中国式管理的根基很难合法,但在系统化的知识体系的"学科"视角下具备形而上的价值指导特质的中国式管理则有着得天独厚的合法优势,科学强调事物内在的本质规律或公理,是不存在地域划分的。因此,中国式管理的定位是有主次之分的,应以应然层面为核心,并建立对实然层面的指导,只有将二者有机融合起来的领域才是其立足之根本。

Since the 1980 s when China entered the transition period,academics and entrepreneurs have begun to reflect on the applicability of the Western management science as universally applicable ＂biblical＂science. The establishment of a Chinese-style management problem that is consistent with Chinese culture and guided by Chinese traditional philosophy has become a hot topic in the management academic community. Is there a border between management sciences？ What is lacking in Chinese-style management is only systematization at the natural science level？ What is the essence of Chinese-style management？ which is at the application level to solve the problem of the inefficiency or stagnation of enterprises in the real world？ Or should it continue to stay at the metaphysical level to provide a general discussion of problems in management practice？The guidance,or Chinese-style management,has become synonymous with modeling at the application level and methodology at the speculative level. The above series of issues call for us to not forget the ＂early mind＂on the basis of further innovative research on the issue of management localization,and to define the modern concept in terms of Chinese-style administrative legitimacy. This is still to ensure the management＇s localization along the research path. The core issues in the right direction cannot be ignored. The positioning problem of Chinese-style management is the basic problem to verify the legitimacy of this academic term. Under the positivist paradigm of scientific attributes,the foundation of Chinese-style management is difficult to legalize,However,under the ＂discipline＂perspective of a systematic knowledge system,it has metaphysical and value-guiding characteristics. Chinese-style management has a unique and legal advantage. Science emphasizes the inherent essential laws or axioms of things. There is no geographical division. Therefore,the orientation of Chinese-style management is divided between primary and secondary issues. It should focus on the level that ought to be,and establish guidance on the actual level. Only the areas that organically integrate the two are the basis for their establishment.