小儿病毒性心肌炎两种治疗方法疗效比较

Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Two Therapeutic Methods for Viral Myocarditis in Children

目的:对小儿病毒性心肌炎的两种治疗方法的疗效进行分析和比较。方法:选取某院2015年1月~2016年3月收治的90例病毒性心肌炎患儿,按照随机数表法将患儿平均分为观察组和对照组,两组患儿均接受相同的常规治疗,在此基础上再给予观察组患儿果糖二磷酸钠注射液和黄芪注射液,比较两组患儿临床疗效。结果:两组患儿不良反应发生率之间的比较差异不显著(P>0.05);观察组患儿治疗总有效率为97.78%,显著高于对照组患儿的82.22%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:常规治疗基础上联合使用果糖二磷酸钠注射液和黄芪注射液治疗小儿病毒性心肌炎疗效显著、安全可靠,值得临床进一步推广和使用。

Objective：To analyze and compare the curative effect of two treatment methods of viral myocarditis in children.Methods：90 cases of children with viral myocarditis treated in a hospital from January2015 to March 2016 were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method.The two groups received the same routine treatment.On this basis,the observation group was given fructose sodium diphosphate injection and astragalus injection.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results：There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups（P〉0.05）.The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was97.78%,which was significantly higher than that in the control group（82.22%）,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：On the basis of conventional treatment,the combined use of fructose sodium diphosphate injection and astragalus injection in the treatment of viral myocarditis in children is significant,safe and reliable,which is worthy of further clinical popularization and application.