摘要
[目的]采用灰色决策和聚类分析评价卷烟感官质量。[方法]对市场上30种不同牌号卷烟进行灰色决策和聚类分析。[结果]在注重指标权重的情况下,不同编号卷烟感官质量的得分由高到低依次为28、30、26、25、29、27、20、19、18、24、21、17、15、23、13、16、12、22、14、10、11、8、9、7、65、3、2、1、4。编号28卷烟和编号30卷烟感官质量得分优于其他规格的卷烟,综合效果测度值分别为0.994和0.992,编号4卷烟感官质量得分最低,综合效果测度值是0.895。系统聚类将30种牌号的卷烟分为4类:第1类包含7个规格的卷烟,编号分别为5、9、6、11、12、10、7;第2类包含4个规格的卷烟,编号分别为2、3、1、4;第3类包含11个规格的卷烟,编号分别为21、28、24、27、20、30、22、23、25、26、29;第4类包含8个规格的卷烟,编号分别为14、15、19、8、13、16、17、18。[结论]该研究结果为卷烟质量评价提供了理论依据。
[Objective] The grey decision and cluster analysis were used to evaluate the sensory quality of cigarettes. [Method]Through grey decision and cluster analysis,30 kinds of cigarettes in the market were made a sensory quality appraisal. [Result]When the weight of characters was considered,the order of sensory quality appraisal of cigarettes was 28,30,26,25,29,27,20,19,18,24,21,17,15,23,13,16,12,22,14,10,11,8,9,7,65,3,2,1 and 4. The comprehensive measure values of No. 28 and No. 30 cigarette were 0. 994 and0.992,and had greatest performance,while the comprehensive measure values of No.4 cigarette was 0.895,and had poorest performance. The30 kinds of cigarettes were classified into 4 categories as followed: the first category included 5,9,6,11,12,10 and 7; the second category included 2,3,1 and 4; the third category included 21,28,24,27,20,30,22 and 23; the fourth category included 14,15,19,8,13,16,17,18; 25,26 and 29. [Conclusion] The result provides reference for the quality evaluation of cigarette.
作者
黄清芬
王玉胜
HUANG Qing-fen;WANG Yu-sheng(Technology Center, China Tobacco Guangdong Industrial Corporation, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510145)
出处
《安徽农业科学》
CAS
2018年第16期14-16,29,共4页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
关键词
卷烟
灰色局势决策
聚类分析
感官质量
Cigarette
Grey decision
Cluster analysis
Sensory quality