期刊文献+

大学治理进程中高校教师主体地位建构——交往行动理论视角 被引量:1

Reestablishment of the Faculty's Dominant Role in the Process of University Governance-from the Perspective of Communicative Action Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政人员与教师是大学治理的两大核心主体,大学治理目标实现的关键就在于促成两大主体间有效的交往行动。哈贝马斯的交往行动理论提出有效交往的四个必要条件,即可理解性、真实性、正当性和真诚性。以该理论为视角审视行政人员与教师间的交往行动,发现群体间的文化冲突、大学管理的内卷化及内部人控制问题等原因导致教师地位边缘化,两大主体并没有形成有效交往。通过制度保障、组织依托、文化支撑三个层面的建设以期重塑教师在大学治理中的主体地位。 Administrators and the faculty are the core subjects in the university governance; the key to achieving the goal of governance, therefore, is to promote effective communication between the two bodies. According to Habermas, effective communication needs four necessary conditions:understandability, truthfulness, legitimacy, and sincerity. From this perspective, this paper has examined the communicative actions between the two groups of people. The investigation finds that inter-group cultural conflicts, the involution of management, and the problem of insider control have resulted in the marginalization of the faculty; effective communication has not occurred between the two bodies. The reestablishment of the faculty's dominant role in university governance can be achieved through the construction of institutional guarantee, organizational support, and cultural sustainment.
作者 黄文武 艾馨
出处 《江汉大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第3期114-118,共5页 Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目重点项目"社会转型背景下高校教师角色适应研究"(14D317)
关键词 交往行动理论 高校教师 内卷化 内部人控制 物化逻辑 communicative action theory faculty involution insider control materialization logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1郭卉.大学治理中教师与行政人员的关系:基于社会资本的研究[J].现代大学教育,2005,21(3):48-52. 被引量:17
  • 2燕继荣.协商民主的价值和意义[J].科学社会主义,2006(6):28-31. 被引量:117
  • 3刘文富.网络政治[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002..
  • 4American Association of University Professors. State- ment on Governance of Colleges and Universities (1968) [EB/OL]. [-2012-06-15]. http://www, aaup. org/govern, htm.
  • 5PULLEY J. Independent Report Generally Clears Auburn University of Charges That it Acted Inappropri- atelyFN. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2002-12-20 (A15).
  • 6郭卉.大学治理中的评议会制度--美国公立研究型大学的经验及其启示[R].北京:中央教育科学研究所,2008:60.
  • 7CALLAN P M, DOYLE W, FINNEY J E. Evaluating State Higher Education Performance: Measuring Up 2000[-J]. Change,2001,33(2) : 14.
  • 8KEZAR A, ECKEL P. Moving Beyond the Gap Be- tween Research and Practice in Higher Education [-M//New Direction for Higher Education(Vol 2000, Issue 110). San Francisco:Josse-Bass:2.
  • 9MILLER D. Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Dis- advantaged Groups? [M]//Maurizio Passerin D ' entrves. Democracy as Public Deliberation. New Per- spectives. Manchester University Press, 2002 : 201.
  • 10VALADEZ J M. Deliberative Democracy, Political Le- giti-macy, and Self-Democracy in Multicultural Societie [-M]. USA Westview Press,2001.30.

共引文献27

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部