期刊文献+

主体性之“我执”批判——论刘慈欣《三体》之“黑暗森林” 被引量:1

A Criticism of Egocentrism of Subjectivity:On the Dark Forest of The Three-body Problem by Liu Ci-xin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主体性的我执导致对所有他者的抽象否定和无端攻击,这突出体现在《三体》揭露的黑暗森林法则之中。因此,对主体性我执的批判,就可以理解为这部科幻小说"宇宙寓言"的最大寓意。小说主要人物在与黑暗森林的对抗中,罗辑的力量源自其扩展论的自我观念,程心则由于将规范与存在划界的思维,导致其对执剑人责任的放弃,章北海作为"轮回"的三体人,代表着人类物种"大我"面对死亡的崇高尊严,同时又是个体悲剧的制造者,而云天明则展示了其超越作为主体性表现之一的浪漫之爱的过程。 The egocentrism of subjectivity attacks whatever anyone abstractively and gratuitously,shows markedly in the Dark Forest created in The Three-body Problem.The most important moral in the fiction,consequently,is to express criticism of egocentrism.As one of chief figures who resisted the Dark Forest,Luo Ji's power came from the concept extended ego,while the liability of Peoplewho-holding-the-sword was given up by Cheng Xin,because of the awareness of dividing specification and existence.Just like the Three Body people,the dignity of human species facing death is embodied by Zhang Bei-hai who also creates sufferings of individuals.Meanwhile the writer reflected the romantic love as an expression of subjectivity by Yun Tian-ming.
作者 岳贤雷 YUE Xian-lei(School of Philosophy,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100089,Chin)
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第2期146-151,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 小说《三体》 “黑暗森林” 主体性 我执 自我 存在 规范 The Three-body The Dark Forest subjectivity egocentrism ego existence specification
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献37

  • 1严锋.追寻“造物主的活儿”——刘慈欣的科幻世界[J].书城,2009(2):56-59. 被引量:25
  • 2Cf. Hannah Arendt, Ich will verstehen, s. 47.
  • 3Margaret Canovan, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 ), p.7.
  • 4川崎修 斯日译.《阿伦特—公共性的复权》[M].河北教育出版社,2002年.第5页.
  • 5Margaret Canovan,Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought, p. 18.
  • 6Cf.Hannah Arendt,The Origins of Totalitarianism,london:Unwin,1967,P.xxxvii.
  • 7Margaret Canovan,Hannah Arendt:A Reinterpretation of Her Pohtical Thought,p.23.
  • 8Margaret Canovan,Hannah Arendt:A Reinteroretation of Her Political Thought,p.20.
  • 9Hannah Arendt,“A Reply”,Review of Pohties 15 (January 1953),PP.77—78.
  • 10Michael Bitnnan,“Totalitarianism: the Career of a Concept”, in Gisela T.Kaplan and Clive S. Kessler (ed.) Hannah Arendt,qlainking, Judging, Freedom ( Sydney: Allen & Unwin,1989 ), pp.56- 68.

共引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部