期刊文献+

奥曲肽预防胰腺切除术后胰瘘及相关并发症的Meta分析 被引量:9

Prophylactic octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula and its related complications after pancreatic resection: a Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用循证医学方法系统评价胰腺切除术后患者使用奥曲肽预防胰瘘及相关并发症的疗效。方法通过计算机检索Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane等数据库及相关参考文献,纳入1990年1月至2017年6月有关胰腺切除术后应用奥曲肽预防胰瘘效果的前瞻性随机对照研究进行分析。根据Cochrane系统评价纳入文献质量,提取有效数据。使用Review Manager5.3软件完成Meta分析。结果最终纳入13篇随机对照研究、2108例患者。其中奥曲肽组1057例,对照组1051例。Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,术后应用奥曲肽组患者总体胰瘘(A、B、C级胰瘘)及总体并发症发生率降低,差异有统计学意义(分别为14.7%比21.6%,RR=0.67,95%CI:0.56—0.81,P〈0.05;25.7%比35.7%,RR=0.71,95%CI:0.58—0.87,P〈0.05)。但是奥曲肽组与对照组在临床相关性胰瘘(B、C级胰瘘)发生率、围手术期病死率、胃排空延迟、出血、腹腔内感染、术后胰腺炎等其他并发症发生率和再手术率方面差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论胰腺切除术后预防性使用奥曲肽可有效降低术后总体胰瘘发生率,可在一定程度上减少术后总体并发症的发生,但是无法减少临床相关性胰瘘(B、C级胰瘘)的发生,不能使患者围手术期病死率降低。 Objective To study the clinical impact of prophylactic octreotide on patients who underwent pancreatic resection using evidence-based medicine. Methods Electronic databases which included the Cochrane library, Pubmed and Embase were searched. A Meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical impact of prophylactic octreotide on pancreatic resection was performed. The evaluation of the literature quality and the effective of the data were based on the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. The Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Results 13 studies which involved 2 108 patients were included into this study, with 1 057 patients in the octreotide group and 1 051 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis revealed that the rates of pancreatic fistula (PF), including Class A, B and C and the total postoperative complication rate were lower in patients treated with prophylactic octreotide than those without octreotide ( 14.7% vs. 21.6%, RR = 0. 67, 95% CI: 0. 56 - 0. 81, P 〈 0. 05 ; 25.7% vs. 35.7%, RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0. 58 - 0. 87, P 〈 0.05 ). However, octreotide did not significantly reduce the incidences of clinically relevant fistulas including Class B and C, perioperative mortality, delayed gastric emptying, bleeding, abdominal infection, postoperative pancreatitis, and re-operation ( all P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion Octreotide reduced PF including Class A, B and C and decreased the total complication rate, but did not reduce the clinically relevant fistulas and perioperative mortality.
作者 张鼎 侍书成 高运 杨波 Zhang Ding;Shi Shucheng;Gao Yun;Yang Bo(Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow Universit;The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou 213003, China)
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第6期411-416,共6页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
关键词 胰瘘 胰腺切除术 奥曲肽 并发症 荟萃分析 Pancreatic fistula Pancreatic resection Octreotide Complications Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献49

  • 1沈柏用,叶靳华,邓侠兴,韩波,翁原驰,王伟珅,詹茜,李宏为,彭承宏.机器人辅助胰腺手术的消化道重建:胰肠吻合还是胰胃吻合[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2012,5(3):15-19. 被引量:5
  • 2孙文兵,冯晓彬,张丰深,韩本立,蔡景修.从病理生理看胰十二指肠切除术消化道重建方式的改良——介绍一胆胰分离式消化道重建方式[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,1998,4(6):400-401. 被引量:8
  • 3Shukla PJ, Barreto SG, Fiugerhut A. Do c pancreatic ductal stents after pancreatic resections improve outcomes? [ J ]. Pancreas ,2010,39 ( 5 ) :561-566.
  • 4Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [ J]. Surgery, 2005,138 ( 1 ) : 8 -13.
  • 5Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, et al. Selection of pancreaticojejunostomy techniques according to pancreatic texture and duct size [ J ]. Arch Surg, 2002,137 ( 9 ) : 1044 - 1047.
  • 6Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a prospective randomized trial[ J]. Ann Surg,2007,246(3 ) :425-433.
  • 7Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, et al. External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy : prospective muhicenter randomized trial [ J]. Ann Surg,2011,253 (5) :879-885.
  • 8Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy [ J ]. Br J Surg,2012,99(4) :524-531.
  • 9Hong S,Wang H,Yang S, et al. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg,2013,17 ( 8 ) : 1516-1525.
  • 10Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejnnostomy for pancreaticodaodenectomy [ J ]. Am J Surg,2010,199 ( 6 ) :759-764.

共引文献43

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部