期刊文献+

中文网站有关痔疮治疗信息的分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the Treatment Information of Hemorrhoids in Chinese Website
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨中文网站中痔的治疗信息的质量分析。方法:中文搜索引擎下选择百度、谷歌、雅虎、搜狗、360等网站,手工检索灰色文件(方法生僻或民间处方),检索词为"痔治疗""痔疮治疗",将符合纳入、排除标准的文献纳入其中,文献检索时间为2017年5月1日。筛选出每个搜索引擎的前50个检索,分别对入选的文献质量、交叉等进行核对、验证。结果:40.0%以上的网站会涉及症状、发病率、药物治疗、手术治疗及治疗预后;有10.0%左右网站中存在错误信息;Spearson相关分析显示:中文网站痔内容评分与Discern评分可信度得分、详尽度得分、总分及评价得分呈正相关性(P<0.05)。结论:中文网站中痔的信息较多且参差不齐,质量较差,不宜全信,应根据自身情况正确就医。 Objective: To explore the quality analysis of hemorrhoids in Chinese websites. Methods: Chinese search engine Baidu, Google, Yahoo, Sogou, 360 sites, such as manual retrieval grey file(method uncommon or folk prescription), retrieve the word for "hemorrhoid treatment" and "hemorrhoids treatment", the literature include met inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature retrieval time is on May 1, 2017. The first 50 searches of each search engine are selected, and the quality of the selected documents and crossreferences are checked and verified. Results: More than 40.0% of the sites involved symptoms, morbidity, medication, surgical treatment and prognosis. About 10.0% of the Chinese hemorrhoids are incorrect information. According to Spearson correlation analysis, the scores of hemorrhoids content of Chinese websites was positively correlated with the credibility scores of Discern, detail scores, total scores and evaluation scores(P〈0.05). Conclusion: The Chinese website has many hemorrhoids information and uneven quality. It is not suitable for the whole letter and should seek medical treatment according to the situation.
作者 齐保聚 杨进山 QI Bao-ju;YANG Jin-shan(Department of Proctology, Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijing 102600, P.R.C.)
出处 《中国数字医学》 2018年第6期98-100,共3页 China Digital Medicine
关键词 中文网站 痔疮 治疗信息 质量分析 理论指导 Chinese website hemorrhoids treatment information quality analysis theoretical guidance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献52

共引文献58

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部