期刊文献+

中国省际绿色发展指数空间计量分析 被引量:10

Spatial Econometric Analysis on Chinese Inter-Provincial Green Development Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章构建了评价省际绿色发展的指标体系,采用因子分析法进行绿色发展综合评价;利用GEODA软件进行探索性空间数据分析(ESDA);空间杜宾模型(SDM)分析结果显示:(1)省际绿色发展指数空间格局呈现HH和LL的集聚模式。区域上表现为东部〉中部〉西部和东部。(2)空间溢出效应分析表明产业结构IS和城市化率对临近区域绿色发展有助催作用,科技创新水平TL对临近区域绿色发展具有负向溢出效应,显示出TL呈现虹吸效应。 This paper constructs the index system of evaluation of inter-provincial green development, and then adopts the factor analysis method to carry on the green development comprehensive evaluation. Finally the paper uses GEODA software to carry out exploratory spatial data analysis. Analysis results of spatial Durbin model(SDM) show that(1) the spatial pattern of inter-provincial green development index shows the clustering pattern of HH and LL; the area is characterized by the eastern greater than the central which is greater than the western and the eastern.(2) The spatial spillover effect analysis shows that the industrial structure IS and the urbanization rate have a positive effect on the green development of the adjacent areas; the technological innovation level TL has a negative spillover effect on the green development in the adjacent area, showing that the TL exhibits a siphon effect.
作者 郝汉舟 周校兵 Hao Hanzhou;Zhou Xiaobing(School of Resources Environmental Science and Engineering;Land and Water Resources Research Center of the Middle Yangtze River, Huhei University of Science and Technology, Xianning Hubei 437100, China)
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第12期114-118,共5页 Statistics & Decision
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BGL139) 湖北省软科学研究项目(2018ADC123) 国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201710927008)
关键词 绿色发展 因子分析法 ESDA 空间杜宾模型 green development factor analysis ESDA spatial Doubin model (SDM)
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献60

  • 1张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5625
  • 2田敏霞.基于环境问题的产业空间结构与布局研究[J].太原科技,2007(7):26-27. 被引量:1
  • 3Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson and J. Robinson, 2004, “Institutions As the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth”, NBER Working Paper,No. w10481.
  • 4Barro, R. , 1991 ,“Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), pp. 407-443.
  • 5Barro, R. and M. McCleary, 2003, “Religion and Economic Growth”, Harvard University Working Paper.
  • 6Bernard, A. and C. Jones, 1996, “Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries”, American Economic Review, 86(5), pp. 1216-1238.
  • 7Bils, M. and P. Klenow, 2000, “Does Schooling Cause Growth?” American Economic Review, 90(5), pp. 1160-1183.
  • 8Bils, M. and P. Klenow, 2000, “Does Schooling Cause Growth?” American Economic Review, 90(5), PP. 1160-1183.
  • 9Bond, S., A. Hoeffler, and J. Temple, 2001, “GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models”, Unpublished Working Paper, University of Oxford.
  • 10Caselli, F., G. Esquivel and F. Lefort, 1996, “Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics”,Journal of Ecowomic Growth, 1, pp. 363-389.

共引文献604

同被引文献213

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部