摘要
顾颉刚的沿革地理研究与其"古史辨"宗旨一脉相承。20世纪30年代,顾颉刚对古代地理问题的征实性考证,并非转向"建设"或"释古"的表现,而是其辨伪视角在历史演进方法基础上的调整,即顾颉刚研究沿革地理,乃是要利用比此前所用思想、观念等历史演进系统,更为客观可靠的古代地理知识为依据,来拆解传统古史说与客观上古史的关联,进一步坐实其战国、秦、汉造伪说。围绕顾颉刚及"古史辨"而出现的诸如"破坏"、"建设"、"疑古"、"释古"等概念,都有其特定的时代内涵,不宜仅取其字面意思随意使用。
Gu Jiegang's research on Chinese evolutionary geography was of a piece with his thoughts of Critiques of Ancient History. In the 1930 s,his empirical research on the Chinese evolutionary geography was just some adjustments to Critiques of Ancient History,so it didn 't mean that his standpoint of ancient history had been changed from "Yigu"( distrusting ancient hisotry) to "Jianshe"( construction) or"Shigu"( interpreting ancient history). In his Chinese evolutionary geography research,he adopted more advanced critiques method and provided objective ancient geographical evidences for deconstructing traditional ancient history,so the intention of his research was further strengthening his theory of ancient history forged. The concepts such as "Pohuai"( destroying),"Jianshe","Yigu"and"Shigu"raised by Gu Jiegang and other the scholars who took part in Critiques of Ancient History had special meanings,so they couldn't be interpreted literally and misused.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期60-69,共10页
Journal of Historiography
关键词
顾颉刚
古史辨
沿革地理
历史演进方法
Gu Jiegang
Critiques of Ancient History
evolutionary geography
method of history evolution