《隋书·经籍志》著录重出文献述微

On the Documents Being Recorded Repeatedly in the “Jingjizhi” of SUISHU

文献重出特指某种典籍重复出现目录学著作之中。古代学者针对《隋志》文献重出现象的举例和分析,不免流于宽泛。适当考虑典籍称名特别是严格要求卷数和撰者相同,应是判断《隋志》文献重出的前提条件。《隋志》著录重出文献非常明显,主要表现为两种基本模式,亦即同一种文献在两种类别中出现、同一种文献在同一类别中两出,其实际分类则详细表现为七种情况。究其缘由,一方面缘于文献本身在形制和内涵方面的双重性、交叉性以及复杂性,以致撰者在文献归类时无所适从,另一方面归因于撰者并未检读原典,而是直接综合前代目录学成果,甚至在文献归类后没有进行严格校勘。此外,撰人众多导致责任不明和体例不一,事后未经有效统改和严谨处理,同样容易出现重出和淆杂之弊。文献析出也会影响到宽泛意义上的文献重出。《隋志》文献重出现象足以给后学以重要启示。

Documents being recorded repeatedly means some books were recorded repeatedly in one bibliographic book. Though ancient Chinese scholars had noticed that the some books were recorded repeatedly in the ＂Jingjizhi＂of SUISHU,their analyses were too broad and imprecise. Actually,the authors and number of books of documents being recorded repeatedly should stay the same,and the names of the books should be considered,too. Generally speaking,the documents which were recorded repeatedly in the ＂Jingjizhi＂of SUISHU had distinguishing features and fall into two models,namely the same document recorded in different categories or in same category twice,and more specifically,it could fit into seven types. The reason of documents being recorded repeatedly partly lay in the duality,overlapping and complexity of the structures and contents of documents,which made it was difficult to classify the documents,and partly lay in the fact that the＂Jingjizhi＂＇s compilation was based on previous bibliographic books,and the authors didn＇t check them carefully. Besides,being compiled by various hands and lacking careful collation should be responsible for it,and documents coming from the original document is another reason.