《文选》六臣注引经管窥

Spy upon the Six Ministers Notes of Wen Xuan cited classics

《文选》六臣注由李善注与五臣注两大系统构成。李善注旁征博引,引经较多,且较全面,五臣注引经较少,与李善注相去甚远。二注的引经概况反映了各自所绍承的学术传统与注释风格,以此可见二注之不同:李善注以释事为主,五臣注以释义为主。但总的看来,六臣注之引经注文,在阐释文本的同时,亦赋予了经文以一定的文学意义。无独有偶,《文选》文本借助注文亦获得了一定的经学意义,经文与文本互文见义,相得益彰。从引经的角度来研究《文选》六臣注,可以窥见其之学术旨归与文学特质。

The six ministers notes of Wen Xuan were composed of two systems： Li Shan notes and five ministers notes. Li Shah notes cited more classics and more comprehensive. Five ministers cited less classics than Li Shan notes. The classic citation of two notes reflects their academic tradition and annotation style. So we can see the difference between the two annotations： Li Shan notes focuses on explaining allu-sions, and the five ministers are mainly concerned with explaining implications. But on the whole, the six ministers notes cited the classics to note the text, while interpreting the text, and also gave the classics certain literary significance. Coincidentally, the text of Wen Xuan also obtained certain Confucian classics significance with the help of notes. The classics and the text are explained to each other and complement each other. From the perspective of citing classics to study the six ministers notes of Wen Xuan, we can see its academic purpose and literary characteristics.