摘要
利用中国2007—2015年的省级面板数据,比较分析了环境污染治理投资与环境污染、财政环境保护支出与环境污染之间的关系,再实证检验环境污染治理投资与财政环境保护支出对环境污染的影响,并对其影响进行比较分析。研究结论为:第一,环境污染治理投资对环境污染的影响呈稳定的倒"U"型,当前各省份的观测值基本上处于曲线的左侧,环境污染治理投资对降低环境污染的作用并不明显;第二,财政环境保护支出对环境污染的影响也呈稳定的倒"U"型,当前各省份的观测值已处于曲线拐点处与曲线的右侧,对降低环境污染的作用明显,且降低环境污染的作用显著优于环境污染治理投资;第三,当前经济发展水平对环境污染的影响已处于环境库兹涅茨曲线的下降阶段。
In this paper, using the Chinese provincial panel data from 2007-2015, it compares analysis of the relationship between environmental governance investment and environmental pollution, and the relationship between financial environmental expenditure and environmental pollution. The paper tests impact on environmental governance investment and financial environmental expenditure for environmental pollution, and comparing analysis of the effects. The main research conclusions are: the impact of environmental governance investment for environmental pollution is a steady inverted "U", the observations of various provinces are basically at the left of the curve, the role of environmental governance investment reduce the environment pollution is not obvious; the influence of financial environmental expenditure for environmental pollution presents a stable inverted "U", the observations of various provinces are basically at the right of the curve, having an obvious effect on the reduction of environmental pollution, and significantly reducing the environment pollution superior to the effect of environmental governance investment; the influence of the current level of economic development for the environmental pollution is in decline stage of environmental Kuznets curve.
作者
黄珺
余朝晖
HUANG Jun;YU Zhaohui(Nanchang Institute of Science & Technology, Nanchang Jiangxi 330108, China;School of Economics & Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang Jiangxi 330031, China)
出处
《生态经济》
北大核心
2018年第7期83-87,共5页
Ecological Economy
基金
江西省社会科学“十二五”规划项目“生态效率视阈下的财政转移、产业结构与区域功能定位研究”(15GL33)
江西省2015高校人文社会科学研究项目“融资约束背景下的行业投资生态效率研究:区域协同发展视角”(GL1583)
关键词
环境污染
环境治理投资
财政环境保护支出
environmental pollution
environmental governance investment
the fiscal spending on environmental protection