摘要
目的对ABI-7300荧光定量PCR仪和上海宏石SLAN96P荧光定量PCR仪进行比对和偏差分析。方法在本院检验科ISO15189实验室认可中使用ABI7300和宏石SLAN96P荧光定量PCR仪同时检测20例涵盖整个仪器线性的HBVDNA标本,以ABI-7300荧光定量PCR仪作为参比仪器,SLAN96P荧光定量PCR仪作为实验仪器,进行回归分析,计算偏倚%,评价其是否可接受。结果 ABI-7300荧光定量PCR仪与SLAN96P荧光定量PCR仪检测HBV-DNA的定量结果相对偏倚为6.9%,符合CNAS-CL36《医学实验室质量和能力认可准则在基因扩增检验领域的应用说明》明确要求即系统误差绝对值小于7.5%。结论 ABI-7300荧光定量PCR仪与SLAN96P荧光定量PCR仪检测的HBV-DNA结果具有可比性,可为临床提供可接受的检验结果。
Objective The ABI-7300 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument and Shanghai Hongshi SLAN96P fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument were compared for a deviation analysis. Methods ABI7300 and SLAN96P fluorescent quantitative PCR instrument were used to detect 20 HBV-DNA samples covering the entire instrument spectrum. ABI-7300 fluorescence quantitative PCR was used as the reference instrument while SLAN96P fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument was used as an experimental instrument. We conducted regression analysis and calculated the bias% to evaluate whether it is acceptable. Results The bias% of detecting the samples by ABI-7300 and SLAN96P fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument was 6. 9% ,which was in accordance with CNAS-CL36 "Medical Laboratory Quality and Competency Approval Criteria in the field of gene amplification test", It required that the absolute value of the system error should be less than 7.5%. Conclusion The ABI-7300 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument and the SLAN96P fluorescence quantitative PCR had comparable results in detection of HBV- DNA, which can provide clinically acceptable test results.
作者
王芳
冯长超
崔辰莹
陈丹丹
于丹军
WANG Fang;FENG Chang- chao;CUI Chen- ying;CHEN Dan- dan;YU Dan-jun(Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao 066000, Chin)
出处
《标记免疫分析与临床》
CAS
2018年第6期915-917,共3页
Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine