摘要
司法经济原则在WTO争端解决过程中被DSB广泛运用,通过对WTO争端解决过程中第三方提交的意见进行梳理并类别化,WTO争端解决中司法经济原则适用问题进行了研究。研究发现,混合性第三方意见注重裁决范围多于裁决结果,注重潜在利益多于实在利益,注重裁决作为先例对未来的影响多于裁决本身。混合第三方意见极大促进了司法经济原则的适用,加快了案件的处理进度,提高了案件审理效率,强化了案件的执行。这些对中国参与WTO争端解决具有重要的启示意义。
The politics of judicial economy is widely used by DSB. By classifying and combing the submissions of third parties in the process of WTO dispute settlement,the article finds that mixed submissions of third parties care about the scope of the ruling more than the outcome of the ruling,care about potential benefits more than real benefits,care about the affect for the future as precedent more than the ruling itself. The mixed third party opinion promotes the application of the politics of judicial economy,speeds up the progress of the case,improves the efficiency of the trial and strengthens the implementation of the case,which has an important significance for China's participation in WTO dispute settlement.
作者
邵丹
SHAO Dan(Law School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093)
出处
《财贸研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期26-35,92,共11页
Finance and Trade Research
基金
国家社科基金一般项目"中国与‘一带一路’沿线国家自由贸易协定中的管制合作研究"(17BFX160)的阶段性成果