期刊文献+

重度全身炎性反应综合征对全主动脉弓置换术后早期临床结局的影响 被引量:2

Relationship Between Severe Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and In-hospital Outcomes In Patients After Total Aotic Arch Replacement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析深低温停循环全主动脉弓置换术患者的临床资料,探索重度全身炎性反应综合征(SIRS)对全主动脉弓置换术后早期临床结局的影响。方法通过分析我院2013年5月至2014年12月全部深低温停循环下行全主动脉弓置换术患者的临床数据,根据术后48小时内SIRS评分,将患者分为非重度组(N组,SIRS评分≤3分)和重度组(S组,SIRS评分为4分),比较两组患者术后住院期间各种并发症的发生情况,分析重度SIRS对全主动脉弓置换术后早期各项临床结局的影响。结果共入选269例患者,男性196例(72.8%),术后有104例(38.6%)发生重度SIRS。与非重度SIRS组相比,重度SIRS组术后机械通气时间(82.6±22.1h vs 37.4±15.0 h,P=0.011)、ICU停留时间(7.2±6.1d 3.8±2.2d,P<0.001)及住院时间(14.7±10.9d vs 12.1±6.5d,P=0.006)明显延长;且两组在院内死亡率(1.1%vs 4.9%,P<0.05),血液透析发生率(7.8%vs 20.1%,P<0.01),肺部感染发生率(19.8%vs 40.9%,P<0.01),二次插管(2.8%vs 9.8%,P<0.01),气管切开(0.6%vs 6.7%,P<0.01),消化道出血(2.0%vs 6.1%,P<0.05)方面有明显的统计学差异;而两组患者脑卒中(1.4%vs 3.7%,P=0.18)、截瘫(2.5%vs 5.5%,P=0.084)、谵妄(2.8%vs 5.5%,P=0.127)、二次开胸止血(3.1%vs 4.9%,P=0.307)发生率无明显差异。结论重度SIRS在深低温停循环下全主动脉弓置换术后的发生率较高(38.6%),并延长患者术后机械通气时间、ICU停留时间及住院时间,明显增加住院期间死亡、肺部感染、血滤、二次气管插管、气管切开、消化道出血的发生率。 Objective To analyze the relationship between severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome and in-hospital outcomes in patients after total aotic arch replacement. Methold 269 patients undergoing total aotic arch replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest between May 2013 and December 2014 were retrospectively studied. According to SIRS score within 48 hours after operation,patients were divided into 2 groups, the group of severe SIRS(meet 4 criterias) and the group of non-severe SIRS(others).The baseline characters and postoperation complications were recorded. Result Totally 269 patients were included.196(72.8%)were men. 104(38.6%) patients after total aotic arch replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest developed severe SIRS. Compared to the non-severe SIRS group, the severe SIRS group showed significant longer duration of mechanical ventilatin(82.6±22.1 h vs 37.4±15.0 h, P=0.011), ICU stay(7.2±6.1 d 3.8±2.2 d, P〈0.001)and hospital stay(14.7±10.9 d vs 12.1±6.5 d, P=0.006). And also showed higher motality(1.1% vs 4.9%, P〈0.05), hemodialysis(7.8% vs 20.1%, P〈0.01),pulmonary infection(19.8% vs 40.9%, P〈0.01),reintubation(2.8% vs 9.8%, P〈0.01), tracheotomy(0.6% vs 6.7%, P〈0.01), gastrointestinal hemorrhage(2.0% vs 6.1%, P〈0.05). But no significant difference on stroke(1.4% vs 3.7%, P =0.18), paraplegia(2.5% vs 5.5%, P =0.084), delirium(2.8% vs 5.5%, P =0.127), reoperation(3.1% vs 4.9%, P =0.307). Conclusion Severe SIRS after total aotic arch replacement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is associated with increasing motality,hemodialysis,pulmonary infection,reintubation,tracheotomy,gastrointestinal hemorrhage and also prolonging the duration of ICU stay and hospital stay.
作者 李军 周荟 李红艳 杨丽静 石晟 张丛雅 王越夫 王古岩 LI Jun;ZHOU Hui;LI Hong-yan;YANG Li-jing;SH;ZHANG Cong-ya;WANG Yue-fu;WANG Gu-yan(Department of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing 100037, China)
出处 《中国分子心脏病学杂志》 CAS 2018年第1期2339-2341,共3页 Molecular Cardiology of China
基金 北京协和医学院青年教师培养项目(2015E-JP01) 国家自然科学基金(81770414)
关键词 全身炎性反应综合征 主动脉弓 临床结局 深低温停循环 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Aotic Arch Clinical Outcomes Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1李李,沈金美,何小京,常业恬.乌司他丁对体外循环患者血浆细胞因子水平及呼吸指数的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(8):578-581. 被引量:29
  • 2Diegeler A, Doll N, Rauch T, et al. Humoral immune response during coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of limited approach, " offpump " technique, and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation, 2000,102( 19 Suppl 3) : Ⅲ95-Ⅲ100.
  • 3Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, et al. Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000,69 : 1198-1204.
  • 4Fransen E, Maessen J, Dentener M, et al. Systemic inflammation present in patients undergoing CABG without extracorporeal circulation. Chest, q998, 113 : 1290-1295.
  • 5Brasil LA, Gomes WJ, Saloma R, et al. Inflammatory response after myocardial revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998,66 : 56-59.
  • 6Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Goodman SV, et al. Influence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis on outcome of critically ill infected patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2003,168:77-84.
  • 7Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. Report of the American- European consensus conference on ARDS: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes and clinical trial coordination. The Consensus Committee. Intensive Care Med, 1994,20 : 225-232.
  • 8Takala A, Jousela I, Takkunen O, et al. A prospective study of inflammation markers in patients at risk of indirect acute lung injury. Shock, 2002,17 : 252-257.
  • 9Park WY, Goodman RB, Steinberg KP, et al. Cytokine balance in the lungs of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,164:1896-1903.
  • 10Fernandez-Patron C, Zouki C, Whittal RM, et al. Methods for analysis of matrix metalloproteinase regulation of neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion. Biol Preced Online, 2002,4 : 38-48.

共引文献3

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部