祝宇红《张爱玲小说的个人主义探寻》疑与析

Doubts and Analysis of Zhu Yuhong's Individualism in Eileen Chang's Novels

祝宇红的《张爱玲小说的个人主义探寻》一文多有失判。该文认为"在个人主义的问题上,张爱玲的小说对鲁迅的小说就颇有所呼应",这点并无依据。该文认为《祝福》中"‘我’不肯回答祥林嫂的‘灵魂有无’质询""源于信仰失落造成的虚无感",这是祝宇红和当前不少学者对鲁迅《祝福》的误读。该文对张爱玲的个人主义与政治关系的判断尤其牵强,因为张爱玲的政治观察和个人主义诉求一脉相承,不存在任何"拷问"情形。自恋、自欺和虚无不全是现代社会文化语境中的扭曲变态心理,自恋和自欺本是一般国民心理,虚无也多源于中西文学传统。要言之,祝宇红对"张爱玲小说的个人主义探寻"话题的研究不得要领。

Zhu Yuhong’s Individualism in Eileen Chang’s Novels has many misjudgments. This paper argues that＂on the issue of individualism,Eileen Chang’s novels echo Lu Xun’s novels＂,which has no basis. The article argues that ＂I＂refuse to answer Xianglinsao’s ＂soul＂question ＂from the feeling of nothingness caused by loss of faith＂,which is Zhu Yuhong and many scholars’ misreading of Lu Xun’s Blessing at present. This paper makes a particularly far-fetched judgment on the relationship between Eileen Chang’s individualism and politics,because Eileen Chang ’s political observation and individualism appeal are in the same line,and there is no ＂torture ＂situation. Narcissism,self deception and nihilism are not the distorted psychology of the modern society in the cultural context. Narcissism and self-delusion are the general national psychology,and nihilism also originates from the Chinese and western literary tradition. It should be said that Zhu Yuhong ’s research on the topic of Individualism in Eileen Chang’s Novels is far from essential.