期刊文献+

胆总管结石术后T管拔除前T管造影的临床价值 被引量:2

Clinical value of T-tube cholangiography before T-tube removal after choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆总管结石行胆总管探查取石术后拔除T管前常规行T管造影的临床价值。方法回顾性分析128例经胆总管探查+T管引流术治疗的胆总管结石患者临床资料,所有患者拔管前均行肝功+B超及T管造影检查。对比分析肝功+B超检查与T管造影检查对胆总管残余结石诊断价值。结果 T管造影后共21例患者出现不同程度的不良反应,占16.4%。肝功+B超检查与T管造影检查评估胆总管残余结石结果无明显差异(P=0.065);两种方式一致性显著(Kappa值:0.682);两种方法对胆总管残留结石的诊断敏感度无显著差异(P=1.000)。结论胆总管结石术后患者T管拔除前的T管造影检查不需要常规进行。拔除T管前充分评估术后恢复情况、肝功及B超结果,有疑问时再进一步T管造影或MRCP等检查是安全可靠的。 Objective To discuss the clinical value of T-tube cholangiography before T-tube removal in patients after choledocholithiasis. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 128 choledocholithiasis patients undergoing common bile duct exploration and T-tube drainage after choledocholithotomy. All the patients underwent liver function +Bultrasonography and T-tube angiography before extubation. The diagnosis results of residual choledocholithiasis by assessing combined liver function+B-ultrasound with T-tube cholangiography were compared. Results After T-tube cholangiography, 21 patients had different degree of adverse reactions, which accounted for 16.4%. Evaluating residual stones results by liver function+B-ultrasound and T-tube cholangiography had no significant difference (P=0.065). Two kinds of methods had a significant consistency (Kappa value=0.682). The diagnostic sensitivity had no significant difference between the two methods of residual common bile duct stones (P=1.000). Conclusion After choledocholithiasis, T-tube cholangiography before T-tube removal is not required. It is safe and reliable to evaluate the postoperative recovery, liver function and B ultrasound before T-tube removal, and to further T-tube angiography or MRCP when in doubt.
作者 梁骁 LIANG Xiao(General Surgery Department,Xi'an No.4 Hospital,Xi'an 710000,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第15期70-71,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 T管造影 T管拔除 胆总管结石 T-tube cholangiography T-tube removal choledocholithiasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1崔英,高建华,张如意,夏庆堂.碘造影剂不良反应的预防及治疗[J].武警医学,2004,15(7):537-537. 被引量:3
  • 2张云,杨志祥,朱茂祥.放射性皮肤损伤的研究进展[J].军事医学科学院院刊,2005,29(2):188-190. 被引量:15
  • 3Horstmann R.Tiwisina C,Classen C,et al.Laparoscopic versusopen appendectomy:which factors influence the decision betweenthe surgical technique?[J].Zenreabl Chir,2005,130(1):48-54.
  • 4Yin S N,Ma H,Li Q L,et al.Primary duct closure after laparo-scopic common bile bile buct exploration:aretrospective study of302 case[J].Laparoendosco Endo Surgy,2001,6(4):205-7.
  • 5Phillip E H.New technique for the treatment of common bile duct-calculi encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].ProblGen Surg,1991,8(6):387.
  • 6Fletcher D R.Percutaneous(laparoscopic)cholecystectomy andexploration of the common bile duct:the common bile duct stonere-exploration of the common bile duct:the common bile ductstonere-claimed for the surgeon[J].Aust N Z J Surg,1991,61(11):814-5.
  • 7Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, et al. Thirteen years'expe- rience with laparoseopie transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones [ J ]. Surg Enclose ,2007,21 ( 1 ) : 34-40.
  • 8Boboev BD. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of eholelithiasis and its complications [ J ]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek, 2012, 171 (2) : 21-24.
  • 9Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangigog- raphy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2001,234 ( 1 ) : 33 -40.
  • 10Zare M, Kargar S, Akbondi M, et al. Role of liver function en- zymes in diagnosis of choledoeholithiasis in biliary colic patients[J]. Acta Med Iran,2011,49(10) : 663-666.

共引文献155

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部