期刊文献+

声带息肉切除手术疗效与围术期预防使用抗菌药物关系分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the relationship between vocal fold polypectomy and perioperative prophylactic use of antibiotics
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨声带息肉切除手术疗效与围术期预防使用抗菌药物的关系。方法回顾性选取广州市第十二人民医院2016年1月至2017年12月收治的行声带息肉切除手术患者资料121例,统计患者围术期预防使用抗菌药物情况,按围术期抗菌药物使用时间不同进行分组,比较各组患者术前术后体温、白细胞计数及嗓音基频微扰、振幅微扰、嗓音障碍严重指数(DSI)等嗓音声学参数,观察其术后声带创面及声门闭合情况。结果 4组患者手术前后白细胞计数、体温比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后4组患者的3项嗓音参数与术前比较均显著改善(均P<0.05),但组间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。动态喉镜检查提示各组患者术后均无创面感染情况发生,创面愈合良好。结论声带息肉手术可不使用抗菌药物预防感染,当存在可能导致切口感染情况时,预防用药时间不宜超过24 h。 Objective To investigate the effect of vocal cord polypectomy and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods A retrospective study of 121 cases of vocal cord polyp resection in Guangzhou twelfth people's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 was conducted to compare the perioperative use of antibiotics to prevent the use of antibiotics in perioperative period. The body temperature, white blood cell count and voice base were compared in each group. Acoustic parameters such as frequency perturbation,amplitude perturbation and voice disturbance severity index were used to observe the postoperative vocal fold wound and glottis closure.Results There was no significant difference in white blood cell count and body temperature between the 4 groups before and after operation(P〉0.05). After the operation,the 3 voice parameters of the 4 groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P〈0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05). Dynamic laryngoscopy showed no wound infection in all groups after operation, and the wound healed well. Conclusion The vocal cord polyp surgery may not use antibacterial drugs to prevent infection,it can accomplish the infection prevention within 24 hours after surgery if there are incision infection factors.
作者 邓英光 张紫萍 谭国杰 DENG Ying-guang;ZHANG Zi-ping;TAN Guo-jie
出处 《中国药物经济学》 2018年第6期80-82,共3页 China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词 声带息肉 抗菌药物 围术期 合理性 Vocal fold polyps Antibiotics Perioperative period Rationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1陈玄珠,吴自开.声带息肉与声带小结的临床病理及超微结构观察[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1989,24(1):53-55. 被引量:25
  • 2马连山,董文会,李学昌,韩在文.支撑喉镜声带息肉切除术后并发舌下神经麻痹[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(5):323-323. 被引量:20
  • 3蔡钺侯 周敏妤 等.声带息肉(附160例报告)[J].中华耳鼻喉科杂志,1984,19(2):96-96.
  • 4Roy N, Merrill RM, Gray SD, et al. Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. Laryngoscope, 2005, 115 : 1988-1995.
  • 5Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, et al. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2004, 47:281-293.
  • 6Perez Femandez CA, Preciado Lopez J. Vocal fold nodules. Risk factors in teachers. A case control study design. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 2003, 54: 253-260.
  • 7Williams NR. Occupational groups at risk of voice disorders: a review of the literature. Occup Med( Lond), 2003,53:456-460.
  • 8Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Niebudek-Bogusz E, Fiszer M, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for occupational voice disorders in teachers. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2006, 58:85-101.
  • 9Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, et al. Voice disorders in teachers and the general population : effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2004, 47:542-551.
  • 10Marcotullio D, Magliulo G, Pezone T. Reinke's edema and risk factors: clinical and histopathologic aspects. Am J Otolaryngol, 2002, 23 : 81-84.

共引文献98

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部