期刊文献+

场景对驾驶人危险辨识能力评估结果的影响 被引量:3

Effects of scenarios on drivers’ hazard perception evaluation result
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高用驾驶人危险辨识能力评估系统得到的评估结果的信效度,探讨评估场景对评估结果的影响。首先,分析各类评估系统中评估场景的异同点;其次,由于评估场景一般为危险情境,通过对危险定义与类型、危险风险度的系统梳理,探讨危险情境对评估结果的影响;最后,通过分析动静态场景的优缺点,探讨场景展现形式对评估结果的影响。结果表明:危险情境的主观和客观风险度的一致性越高,评估结果的信效度越好;动静态场景各有利弊,静态场景能有效避免评估结果的模糊性和驾驶人的疲劳厌烦效应,动态场景更利于理解危险情境,同时更贴近驾驶人实际驾驶时的危险辨识工作机制。 To improve the reliability and validity of evaluation results of drivers obtained by using drivers' hazard perception evaluation systems, the effects of evaluation scenarios on evaluation result were discussed. Firstly,the similarities and differences between the evaluation scenarios in various types of evaluation systems were analyzed. Then,as evaluation scenarios are generally dangerous scenarios,the effects of dangerous scenarios on evaluation results were analyzed through systematically reviewing the definition,types and risk degrees of dangerous scenarios. Finally,through analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the static and dynamic scenarios,the effects of scenarios forms on evaluation results were explored. The results indicate that the higher the consistency between the subjective and objective risks in dangerous scenarios,the better the reliability and validity of the scenarios results,that the static and dynamic scenarios have their advantages and disadvantages,that the static scenarios can effectively avoid the ambiguity of the evaluation results and the driver's tiredness and boredom effect,and that the dynamic scenarios are more conducive to the understanding of dangerous scenarios and are closer to the hazard perception working mechanism when the driver is actually driving.
作者 吴初娜 曾诚 WU Chu'na;ZENG Cheng(Automotive Transportation Research Center, Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期30-35,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 中央级公益性科研所基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2017—9022)
关键词 危险辨识 评估场景 驾驶人 评估结果 信效度 hazard perception evaluation scenarios driver evaluation result reliability and validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献93

  • 1谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(2):17-22. 被引量:174
  • 2金会庆,何存道,陈嵘.危险感受[J].心理科学,1994,17(1):42-46. 被引量:17
  • 3三井達郎,科学警察研究所交通部交通安全研究室.コンビュ-タゲラフイツクにょる事故危險場面の再現[J].月刊交通,1988F.J.J.M.Steyver and D.de Waard,Road-edge.
  • 4Williams,A.F.,and O'Neill,B.(1974),‘On-the-road driving records of licensed race drivers’,Accident Analysis and Prevention,Vol.6,pp.263-270.
  • 5McPherson,K.,and McKnight,A.J.(1976),‘Atask analytic approach todevelopment ofa motor-cycle operator license skill test’,Human Factors,Vol. 18,pp.351-360.
  • 6Jonah,B.A.,Dawson,N.E.,and Bragg,B.W.E.(1981),‘Predicting accident involvement with the motorcycle operator skill test’,Accident Analysis and Prevention,Vol.13,pp.307-318.
  • 7Horswill,M.S.,McKenna,F.P.,2004.A cogni-tive approach to situation awareness:theory and appli-cation.In:Banbury,S.,Tremblay,S.(Eds.),Aldershot.Ashgate Publishing,pp.155-175.
  • 8Wallis,T.S.A.,Horswill,M.S.,2007.Using fuzzy signal detection theory to determine why experi-enced and trained drivers respond faster than novices in a hazard perception test.Accident Analysis and Prevention39,1177-1185.
  • 9Wetton,M.A.,Horswill,M.S.,Hatherly,C.,Wood,J.,Pachana,N.A.,Anstey,K.J.,2010.The de-velopment and validation of two complementary mea-sures of drivers’hazard perception ability.Accident Anal.Prev.42,1232-1239.
  • 10Scialfa CT,Deschênes MC,Ference J,et al.2011;A hazard perception test for novice drivers.Ac-cident;Analysis and Prevention.43,204-208.

共引文献61

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部