摘要
目的:为了解大学生攻击行为与性别角色之间的关系。方法:采用大学生性别角色量表(CSRI-50)和攻击行为量表对414名在校大学生进行问卷调查。结果:大学生性别角色在性别上,女性化存在显著差异(x2=37.879,P<0.01);在专业上,男性化、未分化和双性化上存在显著差异(x2=14.098,13.388,12.129,P均<0.01);大学生的躯体攻击、言语攻击和攻击总分为在性别(t=2.647,3.216,2.127,P均<0.05)和年级(F=2.842,2.776,2.833,P均<0.05)上具有显著差异,而间接攻击方面,无显著差异;女性化得分和男性化得分与攻击行为关系呈显著负相关(r=0.342,P<0.05)。结论:大学生性别角色对其攻击行为具有一定预测作用。
Objective: To investigate the relationship between college students' gender role and aggressive behavior. Methods: By applying Chinese Sex-Role Inventory (CSRI-50) and Aggression Behavior Scale, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 414 college students. Results: There weresignificant differences in gender role of college students. To gender, there was significant difference on feminine (x2=37.879, P〈0.01). To profession, there were significant differences on masculine, undifferentiated and androgyny (x2=14.098, 13.388, 12.129, P〈0,01). Physical aggression, verbal aggression and total attack scores of college students had significant differences in gender (t=2.647, 3,216, 2.127, P〈0.05) and grade (F=2.842, 2.776, 2.833, P〈0.05). And indirect aggression has no significant differences. Scores of masculine and feminine had negative correlation with the score of aggression (r=0.342, P〈0.05). Conclusion: As a whole, Gender role can predict their aggression.
作者
金婷
JIN Ting(Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai 810008)
出处
《科教导刊》
2018年第19期159-161,共3页
The Guide Of Science & Education
关键词
性别角色
攻击行为
大学生
gender role
aggressive behavior
college students