期刊文献+

大学生性别角色与攻击行为的关系研究 被引量:3

The Study on the Relationship of Gender Role and Aggressive Behavior of College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:为了解大学生攻击行为与性别角色之间的关系。方法:采用大学生性别角色量表(CSRI-50)和攻击行为量表对414名在校大学生进行问卷调查。结果:大学生性别角色在性别上,女性化存在显著差异(x2=37.879,P<0.01);在专业上,男性化、未分化和双性化上存在显著差异(x2=14.098,13.388,12.129,P均<0.01);大学生的躯体攻击、言语攻击和攻击总分为在性别(t=2.647,3.216,2.127,P均<0.05)和年级(F=2.842,2.776,2.833,P均<0.05)上具有显著差异,而间接攻击方面,无显著差异;女性化得分和男性化得分与攻击行为关系呈显著负相关(r=0.342,P<0.05)。结论:大学生性别角色对其攻击行为具有一定预测作用。 Objective: To investigate the relationship between college students' gender role and aggressive behavior. Methods: By applying Chinese Sex-Role Inventory (CSRI-50) and Aggression Behavior Scale, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 414 college students. Results: There weresignificant differences in gender role of college students. To gender, there was significant difference on feminine (x2=37.879, P〈0.01). To profession, there were significant differences on masculine, undifferentiated and androgyny (x2=14.098, 13.388, 12.129, P〈0,01). Physical aggression, verbal aggression and total attack scores of college students had significant differences in gender (t=2.647, 3,216, 2.127, P〈0.05) and grade (F=2.842, 2.776, 2.833, P〈0.05). And indirect aggression has no significant differences. Scores of masculine and feminine had negative correlation with the score of aggression (r=0.342, P〈0.05). Conclusion: As a whole, Gender role can predict their aggression.
作者 金婷 JIN Ting(Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai 810008)
机构地区 青海师范大学
出处 《科教导刊》 2018年第19期159-161,共3页 The Guide Of Science & Education
关键词 性别角色 攻击行为 大学生 gender role aggressive behavior college students
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1李少梅.大学生双性化性别特质与人格特征的相关研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1998,27(4):149-153. 被引量:101
  • 2王学.当代大学生人格建构的理想模式——双性化人格[J].现代大学教育,2004,20(4):86-88. 被引量:50
  • 3崔红,王登峰.中国人性别角色形容词评定量表的建构[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(10):948-950. 被引量:12
  • 4王道阳,张更立,姚本先.大学生性别角色观的差异[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):658-664. 被引量:31
  • 5Antill, J. K., & Russell, G. (1982). The factor struture of the Bern sex-role inventory: Method and sample comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 34,183-193.
  • 6Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In: Pervin, L. A. ed. Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (pp.487-521). New York/London: the Guilford Press.
  • 7Bern, S. L. (1974). the measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of consulting and clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162.
  • 8Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 45(2), 196-205.
  • 9Cheng, C. (2005). Processes underlying gender role flexibility: Do androgynous individuals know more or know how to cope? Journal of Personality, 73(3), 645-674.
  • 10Choi, N., & Fuqua, D. R. (2003). The structure of the Bem sex role inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(5), 872-887.

共引文献346

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部