期刊文献+

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床疗效 被引量:1

Efficacy of laparoscope-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床疗效。方法直肠癌患者100例均分为两组,分别采用腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术(观察组)和常规Dixon直肠癌根治术(对照组),比较两组相关手术指标、术后并发症和生存率。结果观察组手术时间、出血量以及肛门排气时间均少于对照组(P<0.05),观察组吻合口漏或感染、粘连性肠梗阻、排尿功能障碍发生率和性功能障碍发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后1、3、5年生存率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论与常规Dixon手术比较,腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后并发症发生率低。 Objective To observe the efficacy of laparoscope-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer.Methods A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer was operated with laparoscope-assisted radical resection(group A,50 cases)and conventional Dixon surgery(group B,50 cases).The surgery-related indicators,postoperative complications and survival rates were compared between two groups.Results Compared to group B,the patients in group A had shorter operation time,less intraoperative bleeding,earlier exhaust,and lower incidences of anastomotic leakage or infection,adhesive intestinal obstruction,urethral and sexual dysfunction(P〈0.05).There were no significant differences in the one-year,3-year and 5-year survival rates between two groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional Dixon surgery,laparoscope-assisted radical resection has the advantages of shorter operation time,less intraoperative bleeding,lower incidence of postoperative complications.
作者 苏红彬 SU Hongbin(Department of General Surgery, Fourth People's Hospital of Rugao , Rugao 226511, CHINA)
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2018年第6期671-674,共4页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 DIXON手术 Laparoscopy Rectal cancer Dixon surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献96

  • 1郑民华,毛志海.腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科的应用现状[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(5):389-391. 被引量:39
  • 2李军,丁克峰,张苏展.结直肠癌患者经腹腔镜手术后短期疗效和安全性的荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(35):2485-2490. 被引量:36
  • 3腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:274
  • 4Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A com- parison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2004,350 (20) :2050-2059.
  • 5Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6 (7) : 477-484.
  • 6Guillou PJ ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2005, 365 ( 9472 ) : 1718-1726.
  • 7Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2006,93 (8) 1921-928.
  • 8Lujan J, Valero G, Hemandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lapamscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2009,96:982-989.
  • 9Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15 : 2418-2425.
  • 10Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, et al. Laparescopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg, 2009,249 : 82-86.

共引文献292

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部