期刊文献+

全自动流水线生化常规检验中危急值复查的临床研究 被引量:1

Clinical investigation on the critical value repeat testing in the routine biochemical detedction of total laboratory automation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨全自动流水线生化常规检验中危急值复查结果的意义。方法回顾性分析全自动流水线生化常规检验的100965份生化标本中出现危急值的标本在流水线上复检情况。结果在100965份生化标本中有1808份生化危急值(占1.79%),复检K^+标本符合率为89.3%,Na^+标本符合率为90.2%,Cl^-标本符合率为88.7%,Ca^2+标本符合率为96.7%,尿糖标本符合率为98.6%,HCO3^-标本符合率为92.3%,血淀粉酶测定标本符合率为96.4%,尿淀粉酶测定标本符合率为96.7%,P^3+标本符合率为95.2%,总符合率为92.1%。复检所需平均时间为35min。结论全自动流水线生化常规标本危急值复检结果和原检结果符合率较高,流水线自动复检耗时较长;对于危急值,流水线自动复检不及人工手动复检时效性高,复检后回报危急值结果并不全是必要的。 Objective To investigate the significance of critical value repeat testing in the routine biochemical samples of total laboratory automation. Methods A total of 100 965 routine biochemical samples were carried in our total laboratory automation, in which critical value repeat testings were retrospectively analyzed. Results There were 1 808 biochemical critical values in 100 965 biochemical specimens( 1.79% ). By repeat testing, the coincidence of K^+ was 89. 3%, 90. 2% of Na^+ , 88.7% of Cl^-, 96.7% of Ca^2+ , 98.6% of GLU, 92.3% of HCO3^- , 96.4% of amylase determination blood, 96.7% of urinary amylase, 95.2% of P^3+ , the total coincidence rate was 92. 1%. The average time required for reinspection was 35 minutes. Conclusions The reexamination results of critical value of routine biochemical specimens in automatic assembly line and original test result have high coincidence rate, but the time consuming of repeat testing is long; to critical value, the chronergy is better by artificial repeat testing than reran by the total laboratory automation. The critical value report after return is not always necessary.
作者 张迎伟 哈斯朝鲁 侯继荣 Zhang Yingwei;Hasi Chaolu;Hou Jirong(Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 035501, China)
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2018年第12期63-65,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 危急值 复查 符合率 全自动流水线 Critical value Repeat testing Coincidence Total laboratory automation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1张真路,刘泽金,赵耿生,杨军,王文武,崔敏.临床实验室危急值的建立与应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):452-453. 被引量:149
  • 2葛荣跃,张伟民.设置检验科危急值和报告制度的重要性[J].江西医学检验,2007,25(1):55-56. 被引量:37
  • 3中国医院协会.2007年患者安全目标.2006.10-21.
  • 4Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. MLD Med Lab Obs, 1972, 4:47-54.
  • 5Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare, Medicaid and CLIA programs: regulations implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA)-HCFA:final rule with comment period. Fed Regist,1992,57:7002-7186.
  • 6The Joint commission. Accreditation Program: Laboratory, National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG. 02.03.01 ). http ://www. jointeommission, org/ Accessed ,2010-07-12.
  • 7College of American Pathologists. Laboratory General Checklist E components GEN. 41320, GEN. 41330, and GEN. 41340 . Available at www. cap. org. Accessed August 6, 2010.
  • 8International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2007: Medical Laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva, Switzerland : International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
  • 9World Health Organization . 2008 field review of patient safety solutions, http://www, who. int/patientsafety/solutions/patientsafety/2008-field- review/en/. Accessed January 18,2009.
  • 10Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Heahhcare organizations : National Patient Safety Goals. Available at http ://www. jcaho, org/accredited + organizations/patient + safety/npsg, htm. Accessed August 22. 2005.

共引文献59

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部