期刊文献+

SLE患者外周血中性粒细胞CD64指数在鉴别并发细菌感染与疾病活动期的临床价值 被引量:5

Clinical Value of Peripheral Blood Neutrophil CD64 Index in Identifying SLE Complicated with Bacterial Infection and Active SLE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨中性粒细胞CD64表达在鉴别系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)并发细菌感染与SLE活动期的临床价值。方法随机选取2017年1~5月期间南京总医院就诊的健康体检者30例,SLE患者34例[其中SLE疾病并发细菌感染组12例(其中并发肺炎3例,其他部位细菌感染9例),按SLE疾病活动指数(systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity-index,SLE-DAI)分为SLE活动组12例(SLE-DAI≥9分)和SLE稳定期组10例(SLE-DAI<9分)]。各组分别进行血细胞计数,C反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)的检测;用流式细胞术检测外周血中性粒细胞CD64的平均荧光强度(mean fluorescence intensity,MFI),并计算出CD64指数(CD64I)及最佳临界值。筛选出诊断SLE并发细菌感染的差异指标,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC),对CD64I联合其他指标判断SLE并发细菌感染的敏感度及特异度进行比较。结果 SLE并发细菌感染组CD64I(0.47±0.40)明显高于SLE活动期组(0.17±0.13)、稳定期组(0.14±0.09)及健康对照组(0.12±0.64)(均P<0.05);ROC曲线分析结果显示:CD64I判断SLE并发细菌感染的敏感度及特异度分别为81.8%和80.0%。结论与3个炎性指标相比,中性粒细胞CD64I对判断SLE并发细菌感染具有更高的准确度,有望用于SLE活动期患者与并发细菌感染者的鉴别。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of neutrophil CD64 expression in the differential diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and combined bacterial infection. Methods According to the SLE disease activity index (SLE- DAD ,12 patients (SLE-DAI≥9) and 10 patients with stable SLE (SLE-DAI〈9) were divided into SLE activity group. 12 cases of SLE complicated bacterial infection and 30 cases of healthy control were followed-up from Nanjing General Hospital during the period from January to May 2017. Each group was tested for WBC,C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sed imentation rate (ESR). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of neutrophils CD64 was measured by flow cytometry. The CD64 index (CD64 I) and the optimal cut off value were calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CD64 I combined with other indicators in the differential diagnosis of SLE infection were compared by mapping the receiver operating charac teristic (ROC) curve. Results The CD64 I (0.47±0.40) in SLE combined bacterial infection group was significantly higher than that in active group (0.17±0.13),stable group (0.14±0.09) and healthy control group (0.12±0.64) (P〈0.05). The sensitivity and the specificity of CD64 index was 81.8% and 80.0% ,respectively. Conclusion Compared with the three inflammatory indexes,the CD64 I of neutrophils had higher accuracy in the diagnosis of SLE complicated bacterial infection, which can be used as the differential diagnosis marker both active and complicated infection SLE.
作者 陈芳芳 张群燕 邢婕 李晓军 CHEN Fang-fang;ZHANG Qun-yan;XING Jie;LI Xiao-jun(Department of Clinical Laboratory;Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanj ing General Hospital, Nanj ing 210002, China)
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2018年第3期14-17,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(No 81470071) 国家临床重点专科建设项目(No 2014ZDZK003-1) 江苏省临床医学科技专项(重点病种的规范化诊疗研究)(No BL2014072) 军区医药卫生科研重大专项(No 14ZX17)
关键词 CD64指数 系统性红斑狼疮 流式细胞术 感染 CD64 index SLE flow cytometry infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献97

  • 1Davis BH. Improved diagnostic approaches to infection/ sepsis detection [ J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2005,5 (2) :193-207.
  • 2Ng PC, Li G, Chui KM, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is a sensitive diagnostic marker for early-onset neonatal infection[ J]. Pediatr Res,2004,56(5 ) :796-803.
  • 3Zhang G, Qiao S, Li Q, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the porcine high-affinity immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaRI)[J]. Immunogenetics, 2006, 58(10) :845-849.
  • 4Danikas DD, Karakantza M, Theodorou GL,et al. Prognostic value of phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes in sepsis. Correlation to CD64 and CD14 antigen expression[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2008, 154 ( 1 ) : 87-97.
  • 5Allen E, Bakke AC,Purtzer MZ, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression : distinguishing acute inflammatory autoimmune disease from systemic infections[J]. Ann Rheum Dis,2002,61 (6) : 522-525.
  • 6Davis BH,Olsen SH, Ahmad E, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is an improved indicator of infection or sepsis in emergency department patients [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130 (5) :654-661.
  • 7Nuutila J, Hohenthal U, Laitinen I, et al. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of FcgammaRI (CD64) expression on neutrophils and monocytes: a new, improved way to detect infections [ J]. J Immunol Methods, 2007, 328 (1-2) : 189-200.
  • 8Zarev PV, Davis BH. Comparative study of monocyte enumeration by flow cytometry: improved detection by combining monocyte-related antibodies with anti-CD163 [J].Lab Hematol, 2004, 10(1) :24-31.
  • 9郝玲,杨恒伟,李艳芝,李彦敏,刘桂玲.新生儿败血症中性粒细胞CD64、CD11b的表达及临床意义[J].临床荟萃,2007,22(19):1382-1385. 被引量:5
  • 10Tsokos GC. Systemic lupus erythematosus [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(22) :2110-2121.

共引文献104

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部