期刊文献+

基于性能退化和材料损伤表征的高铁齿轮箱体故障诊断 被引量:1

Fault diagnosis of high speed gear-box shell based on performance degradation and material damage characterization
原文传递
导出
摘要 高铁齿轮箱体的服役环境恶劣,疲劳和拉伸损伤同时存在,服役周期长,缺少故障损伤数据.为此,针对高铁齿轮箱体的服役特点和安全性需求,采用基于性能退化方法,利用声发射技术对箱体损伤过程进行监测,并提出一种利用Adaboost调整样本分布的方法建立退化模型来表征箱体损伤状态.通过对箱体损伤过程的声发射信号进行分析,实现箱体的有效故障诊断,将箱体拉伸损伤故障诊断的绝对误差控制在30 s以内,疲劳损伤故障诊断的相对误差基本控制在1.1%以内.依据不同损伤原理,所得结果能够有效进行箱体故障诊断. The service environment of the high speed gear-box shell is bad, fatigue and tensile damage exist at the same time, the service cycle is long, and the fault damage data is insufficient. Therefore, according to the service characteristics and safety requirements of the high speed gear-box shell, based on the performance degradation method, the acoustic emission technique is used to monitor the damage process of the gear-box shell. A method using the Adaboost algorithm to adjust the distribution of samples is proposed to establish the degradation model, which can characterize the damage state of the gear-box shell. By analyzing the acoustic emission signal of the damage process, the effective fault diagnosis of the box is realized. The absolute error of the tensile damage diagnosis of the shell is less than 30 s, and the relative error of fatigue damage diagnosis is less than 1.1%. On the basis of the different damage principle, the results can effectively achieve the gear-box shell fault diagnose.
作者 艾轶博 孙畅 张卫冬 AI Yi-bo;SUN Chang;ZHANG Wei-dong(National Center for Materials Service Safety, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1264-1270,共7页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61273205)
关键词 故障诊断 ADABOOST算法 样本分布 性能退化 材料表征 高铁齿轮箱 fault diagnosis Adaboost algorithm sample distribution performance degradation material characterization high speed gear-box
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1金挺.桥梁缆索声发射监测理论与试验研究[D].上海:同济大学土木工程学院,2008.
  • 2Suzuki T, Ohtsu M, Shigeishi M. Relative damage evaluation of concrete in a road bridge by AE rate-process analysis [ J ]. Materials and Structures, 2007, 40:221 -227.
  • 3Yuyama S, Yokoyama K, Niitani K, et al. Detection and evaluation of failures in high-strength tendon of prestressed concrete bridges by acoustic emission [ J ]. Construction and Building Materials , 2007, 21:491-500.
  • 4SUN Li-min, QIAN Ji. Experimental study on wire breakage detection by acoustic emission I J]. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China_ 2011.5 (4) .50_~ - 500_.
  • 5Casey N F, Taylor J L. Evaluation of wire ropes by AE techniques[J]. BrJ Non-Destr Test, 1985,27(6) :351 -6.
  • 6Casey N F, Laura P A A. A review of the acoustic emission monitoring of wire rope [ J ]. Ocean Engineeing, 1997,24 (10) :935 -47.
  • 7Drummond G, Watson J F, Aeamley P P. Acoustic emission from wire ropes during proof load and fatigue testing [ J ].NDT&E International ,2007,40:94 - 101.
  • 8Nair A, Cai C S. Acoustic emission monitoring of bridges: Review and case studies [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32: 1704-1714.
  • 9JIN Ting, SUN Zhi, SUN Li-min. Wave propagation modeling for acoustic emission cable monitoring [ D ]. Proceeding of 4th China-Japan-US symposium on structural control and monitoring,2006.
  • 10Rizzo P, Lanza di Scalea F. Effect of the frequency on the acoustoelastic response of steel bars [ J ]. Experimental Techniques ,2003, 27(6) :40 -43.

共引文献19

同被引文献31

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部