期刊文献+

不同气管插管对颈椎脊髓受压患者颈椎屈曲度及血流动力学的影响 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究不同气管插管对颈椎脊髓受压患者颈椎屈曲度及血流动力学的影响。方法颈椎脊髓受压患者34例,根据气管插管方式分为实验组(12例)、对照A组(11例)、对照B组(11例)。对照A组予以Macintosh直接喉镜插管,对照B组予以光导纤维支气管镜(FOB)插管,实验组予以GlideScope视频喉镜插管。统计3组一次插管成功率、插管操作时间,并对比入室后(T0)、面罩通气时(T1)、暴露声门时(T2)、插管后(T3)颈椎屈曲度变化,诱导前(t0)、诱导后(t1)、插管时(t2)、插管后1 min(t3)、插管后3 min(t4)心率(HR)及平均动脉血(MAP)变化。结果与对照A、B组比较,实验组插管操作时间较短,一次插管成功率较高(P<0.05);T2、T3时颈椎屈曲度变化低于对照A组,波动幅度优于对照A组(P<0.05);t1时3组MAP、HR水平较t0时降低(P<0.05),t3、t4时3组HR较t0时升高(P<0.05)。结论FOB插管、Macintosh直接喉镜插管、Glide Scope视频喉镜插管均能稳定颈椎脊髓受压患者血流动力学,Glide Scope视频喉镜插管一次穿刺成功率高,穿刺时间短,且对颈椎屈曲度影响较小。
机构地区 昌平区医院
出处 《中国地方病防治》 CAS 2018年第3期347-347,350,共2页 Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases
基金 北京市科技计划项目(D1411000000214118)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1王英伟,赵璇,沈赛娥,吴韬,陈锡明,尤新民.择期颈椎手术患者困难气道的研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(3):193-195. 被引量:27
  • 2Kawamoto E, Wakamatsu M, Fujikake K, et al. A case - control study of airway management for 68 patients with cervical spine injury : compar- ison of the direct laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade and the fiberoptic bronchoscope [ J ]. Masui, 2010,59 ( 8 ) : 976 - 980.
  • 3Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, et al. Cervical spinal motion dur- ing intubation:efficacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of com- plete segmental instability[ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2001,94 ( 2 Suppl ) : 265 - 270.
  • 4Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, et al. Management of the diffi- cult airway: a dosed claims analysis [ J]. Anesthesiology, 2005,103 (1) :33 -39.
  • 5Gray H. Use of Cormack and Lehane grading with videolaryngoscopy [ J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2013,41 ( 1 ) : 123 - 124.
  • 6ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons'Committee on Trau- ma, International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS(R) ) : the ninth edition [ J ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013, 74(5) :1363 - 1366.
  • 7Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobi- lization [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 2003,90 ( 5 ) :705 - 706.
  • 8Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, et al. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in pa- tients with cervical spine immobilization[ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101 (5) :723 -730.
  • 9Cuchillo JV, Rodriguez MA. Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new GlideScope videolaryngoscope[ J]. Can J Anaesth, 2005,52 (6) :661 : author redly 661 -662.
  • 10stabilisation of the cervical spine using the Macintosh laryngo- scope vs the McGrath~ Series 5 video- laryngoscope[J]. Anaes- thesia,2014.69( 12 ):1345-1350.

共引文献9

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部