摘要
股权众筹作为新型互联网融资方式,因其新的特点各国均采取了不同的监管路径对其进行规制。从比较研究的视角,介绍意大利、英国、法国与美国在股权众筹法律规定与在本国市场实施过程中的变化,探讨对比四国核心监管逻辑和监管方式的异同,寻找四国在促进融资效率与投资者保护上的平衡点,并结合我国股权众筹现存问题,寻找我国股权众筹法律规制的监管方向。
As a new type of internet financing,equity crowd-funding have new features which leads to different regulatory approaches in different countries. From the perspective of comparative study,this paper introduces the changes of Italy,Britain,France and the United States in the implementation of the legal provisions and the domestic market,discusses and compares the similarities and differences between the core supervision logic and the mode of supervision in the four countries,looking for the balance between the four countries in promoting the efficiency of financing and the protection of the investors,and combining our shares. And it finally will help us to find out the legal path of equity crowd-funding in China.
作者
刘诗瑶
LIU Shi-yao(College of Civil and Commercial Law, Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120 China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第7期127-136,共10页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
股权众筹
JOBS法案
信息不对称
投资者保护
监管
equity crowd-funding
JOBS
information asymmetry
investors protection
regulation