期刊文献+

实践转向的科学论证教学:国际研究新进展 被引量:13

The Practice Turn of Scientific Argumentation Teaching:New Development of International Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着结构式论证教学中出现的问题、困境,以及美国科学教育课程文件《K-12框架》的颁布,研究者开始强调实践转向的科学论证教学。新的研究将教学本质视为认识论实践,提出融合式教学模式,产生了更加多元的教学结果。它反映了如下的趋势和特点:一是更加关注将实践认识论作为教学干预的评估目标;二是越来越多的学者试图从社会文化的视角理解学生在论证中的学习和发展;三是深入探究教师的教学实施。科学论证对于学生科学素养的整合发展具有重要的教育价值。 The related research on scientific argumentation teaching in the new stage regards the nature of scientific argumentation interventions as epistemic practice, proposes the immersive teaching model and generate multiple teaching results, which reflect the following characteristics and trends. First, epistemologies in practice has been more concerned as the evaluation goal for teaching intervention. Second, more and more scholars try to understand students' learning and development from sociocultural perspective. Third, teachers' teaching implementation is investigated deeply. Scientific argumentation has significant educational value for integrated development of students' scientific literacy. This paper reviews the recent international studies, which has the important practical implications for China's new round science education curriculum reform based on key competencies.
作者 宋歌 王祖浩 SONG Ge;WANG Zuhao(Institue of Scientific Curriculum and Instruction, School of Teacher Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;Institute of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期59-67,共9页 International and Comparative Education
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"基于核心素养的课程标准研制的关键问题研究"(17JJD880007)子课题"核心素养的国际比较研究"的研究成果
关键词 科学论证教学 K-12框架 科学实践 认识论 scientific argumentation teaching K-12 frameworks scientific practices epistemologies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 2National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 3C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 4John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 5John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 6Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 7John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.
  • 8Jerome Bruner.Process of Education[M].Boston,MA:Harbard University Press,1961.14.
  • 9Hammer. D..et al.Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students Abilities [A].R.Duschl & R.Grandy.Teaching Scientific INquiry [C].Rotterdam,The Netherlands:Sense Publishers,2005.138-156.
  • 10周玉芝.美国新版K-12科学教育框架对我国基础教育阶段科学教育的启示[J].课程.教材.教法,2012,32(6):120-124. 被引量:30

共引文献129

同被引文献145

引证文献13

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部