期刊文献+

硬膜外穿刺置管对剖宫产患者罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔麻醉效果的影响 被引量:10

Effect of epidural catheterization on ropivacaine subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨硬膜外穿刺置管对剖宫产产妇罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔麻醉效果的影响。方法选择2016年9月至2017年8月山西医学科学院山西大医院妇产科收治的初产单胎足月妊娠行剖宫产孕妇90名,应用随机数字表法分为3组:单纯蛛网膜下腔麻醉组(D,组)、硬膜外穿刺不置管组(D_2组)、脊椎-硬膜外联合麻醉组(D_3组),每组30例。比较3组产妇达感觉阻滞平面时间及恢复阻滞平面时间、产妇运动阻滞评分和运动阻滞起效及恢复时间以及产妇疼痛程度、腹肌松弛程度和牵拉反应程度。结果 D_3组达双侧肋弓下缘连线平面、胸骨剑突平面和最高阻滞平面时间均短于D_1、D_2组[(1.8±0.3)min比(2.5±0.5)、(2.3±0.4)min,(2.2±0.4)min比(3.0±0.4)、(2.8±0.6)min,(2.3±0.3)min比(3.2±0.6)、(3.0±0.4)min],恢复至双侧肋弓下缘连线平面、肚脐平面时间均短于D_1、D_2组[(70±9)min比(85±11)、(80±12)min,(85±4)min比(105±9)、(100±8)min],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。3组产妇运动阻滞评分和运动阻滞起效时间、达最大运动阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞恢复时间以及产妇疼痛程度、腹肌松弛程度和牵拉反应程度比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论单纯硬膜外穿刺置管可缩短剖宫产产妇罗哌卡因的感觉阻滞时间,但不影响运动阻滞时间和临床麻醉效果。 Objective To explore the effect of epidural catheterization on ropivacaine subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section. Methods A total of 90 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section from September 2016 to August 2017 in Shanxi Dayi Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences were randomly divided into 3 groups(n=30): simple subarachnoid anesthesia group(D1 group), epidural puncture without catheterization group(D2 group) and combined spinel epidural anesthesia group(D3 group). Sensory block time, sensory recovery time, motor block score, motor block time, motor block recovery time, pain degree, abdominal muscle relaxation degree and traction reaction degree were analyzed. Results T8, T6 sensory block time and the maximum sensory block plane time in D3 group were significantly shorter than those in D1, D2 group[(1.8±0.3)min vs (2.5±0.5),(2.3±0.4)min; (2.2±0.4)min vs (3.0±0.4),(2.8±0.6)min; (2.3±0.3)min vs (3.2±0.6),(3.0±0.4)min]; T8, T10 sensory recovery time in D3 group were significantly shorter than those in D1, D2 group[(70±9)min vs(85±11),(80±12)min; (85±4)min vs(105±9),(100±8)min](all P〈0.05).Motor block score, motor block time, the maximum motor block plane time, motor block recovery time, pain degree, abdominal muscle relaxation degree and traction reaction degree showed no significant differences among 3 groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Epidural catheterization may shorten sensory block time of ropivacaine in cesarean section, but it does not affect motor block time and the anesthesia effect.
作者 薛立超 韩冲芳 王丽萍 雷亚娟 贺建东 Xue Lichao;Han Chongfang;Wang Liping;Lei Yajuan;He Jiandong(Department of Anesthesiology,Shanxi Dayi Hospital,Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences,Taiyuan 030032,China;Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Shanxi Dayi Hospital,Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences,Taiyuan 030032,China)
出处 《中国医药》 2018年第8期1231-1234,共4页 China Medicine
关键词 剖宫产术 罗哌卡因 麻醉 置管 Cesarean section Ropivacaine Anesthesia Catheterization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1孙志华,郭曲练,邹望远.间断鞘内注射不同浓度罗哌卡因对大鼠脊髓及神经根早期超微结构的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(4):283-287. 被引量:50
  • 2吴林飞.罗哌卡因腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在剖腹产手术中的应用[J].全科医学临床与教育,2007,5(1):69-70. 被引量:2
  • 3Van Kleef JW, Veering BT, Burro AG. Spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine: a double - blind study on the efficacy and safety of 0.5% and 0.75% ,solutions in patients undergoing minor lower limb sur ergy [J]. Anesth Analg, 1994,78(6) : 1125 - 1130.
  • 4Kristensen .ID. Spinal cord blood flow atter intrathecal injection of ropivacaine: ascreening for neurotoxic effects [J] .Anesth Analg, 1996,82(3) : 636 - 640.
  • 5Datta S,Lambert DH,Gregus J,et al.Differential sensitivities of mammalian nerve fibers during pregnancy.Anesth Analg,1983,62:1070-1072.
  • 6Rosenberg PH,Kytta J,Alila A,et al.Absorption of bupivacaine etidocaine lignocaine and ropivacaine into N-heptane,rat sciatic nerve and human extradural and subcutaneous fat.Br J Anaesth,1986,58:310-314.
  • 7Yamashita A,Matsumoto M,Matsumoto S,et al.A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine,lidocaine,bupivacine,and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits.Anesth Analg,2003,97:512-519.
  • 8Santos AC,Arthur GR,Roberts DJ,et al.Effect of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on uterine blood flow in pregnant ewes.Anesth Analg,1992,74:62-72.
  • 9Malinovsky JM,Charles F,Kick O,et al.Intrathecal anesthesia:ropivacaine vacaine versus bupivacaine.Anesth Analg,2000,91:1457-1460.
  • 10Khaw KS,Ngan Kee WD,Wong EL,et al.Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean section:a dose-finding study.Asnesthesiology,2001,95:1346-1350.

共引文献183

同被引文献99

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部