期刊文献+

新高考选考科目计分机制改进研究 被引量:7

Improvement of Scoring Mechanism of Elective Subjects of the New College Entrance Examination Reform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在上海、浙江两地启动的高考综合改革试点中,考生依据"高校要求和自身特长"的选考政策出现了执行偏差。致使选考科目考生群体结构发生了变化,影响了选考科目的科学计分。典型大规模多学科选考的计分经验表明:标准参照的分数解释并进行选考科目的"连接"设计能够有效避免上述政策风险。建议在试点起步阶段使用"量表化"方法改进计分机制,以强化选考科目分数可比的功能设计。同时,应对改进建议的相关风险展开进一步研究:一是,应结合我国新高考实际,开展量表化方法的具体研究;二是,应对标准参照分数解释下的选考科目测验所需的条件准备进行研究。 Shanghai and Zhejiang started the comprehensive reform of college entrance examination. There is a policy implementation deviation of elective subjects based on the "college requirements and their own specialty",which resulting in candidate group structure has changed affecting the scoring scientifically. The typical scoring experience of large-scale multidisciplinary test selection shows that the "Linking"design of the standard reference scores can effectively avoid the above policy risks. Recommended in the pilot phase,to use the "scaling"method to improve the scoring mechanism to strengthen the function of comparable subjects. Further research should be carried out on the related risks of the suggestions for improvement simultaneously: Firstly,we should combine the reality of our new college entrance examination to carry out a specific study based on the scaling. Secondly,the requirements for the test of the elective subjects under the criterion-referenced score explanation should be researched.
作者 王森 Wang Sen(Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, Chin)
出处 《教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期14-20,共7页 Education Science
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学重大招标课题"适应新高考要求的普通高中学业水平考试和综合素质评价实施策略研究"(项目编号:VHAl50003)
关键词 新高考 选考科目 计分 量表化 new college entrance examination elective subjects scoring mechanism scaling
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1广东省考试中心主编.广东高考年报[M]. 广东高等教育出版社, 2004
  • 2Board of Studies NSW.Studying for the NSW Higher School Certifi- cate:An information booklet for Year 10 students. http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/schoolcertificate/pdf_doc/ studying_for_hsc_04.pdf . 2004
  • 3Maxwell,G.Calculation of OPs and FPs. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/publications/te/calopfps.pdf . 1998
  • 4Maxwell,G.Moderation of teacher judgments in student assessment[].Discussion paper on as- sessment and reporting.2002
  • 5Van Krieken,R.Marking and examinations in the Netherlands[].Stud- ies in Educational Evaluation.1987
  • 6The Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education(Nuffic).Higher education in the Netherlands:The system,degrees and diplomas. http://www.nuffic.nl/pdf/service/factsh/henl-system.pdf . 2003
  • 7Schoonderwoerd,L.Examination and certification system at the end of the upper secondary general education:Thesituation in the Netherlands. http://www.mszs.si/exam/nliss.html . 1999
  • 8Wilson,A.Improving the higher education applications process.A consultation paper. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Edu- cation/documents/2005/09/09/ImprovingHE.pdf . 2005
  • 9Brown,T.C.Transforming a random variable to a prescribed distri- bution:an application to school-based assessment[].Journal of Applied Probabihty.2004
  • 10Buchan,A.S.Policy into practice:Internal assessment at 16+:Stan- dardization and moderation procedures[].Educational Research.1993

共引文献67

同被引文献110

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部