私录体育暴力视听资料的合法性及边缘化

Legitimacy and Marginalization of Private Recorded Audiovisual Materials in Sports Violence

私录体育暴力视听资料是证据法介入体育暴力的产物,对刑法打击体育暴力具有重要的证据价值,其合法性是作为证据的前提。私录体育暴力视听资料作为一个学科交叉概念,首先要框定其基本内涵,再进一步明确其主体、内容和手段都具有合法性。主体上,体育参加者及观众录制体育暴力的合法性是基于法理学、合同法、刑事诉讼法的学理分析;内容上,虽然体育暴力的刑法打击与公民隐私权保护产生了价值冲突,但私录体育暴力视听资料因其内容,即体育暴力具有危害性和违法性突破了隐私权保护,获得了合法性地位;手段上,私录视听资料经历了从非法到合法的历程,最终获得合法性,但必须符合一定条件。私录体育暴力视听资料虽然具有极强的证明力,但很容易模糊其合法与非法的界线。为了从外延上厘清私录体育暴力视听资料的合法性,对私录体育暴力视听资料涉及第三人部分,以及对私录体育暴力视听资料"私自外传"行为等都应做出相应的回应。

Private recorded audiovisual information in sports violenee is a product of the evidence law involved in the violence of sports, which has important evidence value for criminal law against sports violence, and its legitimacy is the basis of evidence finalization. As a disciplinary cross concept, we must first set out its basic connotation, and then further clarify its subjects, content and means are legiti- mate. On the subjects, the legitimacy of participants and audience record sports violence is based on jurisprudence, contract law and criminal procedure law. On the content, although there is a value conflict between combating sports violence and protecting privacy of citizens, the private reeorded audiovisual information in sports violence has legal status because sports violence has been harndut and il- legal breakthrough in the protect; ~ privacy. On the means, private recorded audiovisual information has gone from illegal to legal pro- cess, and uhimately gets legitimacy, but must meet certain conditions. Although private recorded audiovisual information in sports vio- lence has a strong proof power, but it is easy to blur the legal and illegal boundaries. In order to further clarify the legitimacy of private recorded audiovisual information in sports violence, we should make a corresponding response to the vesting of it related to the tbird part, as well as the ＂private rumors＂ behavior.