外国法院判决中台湾的法律地位

The Legal Status of Taiwan in the Judicial Decision of Foreign Courts

在涉及台湾法律地位的典型判决中,外国法院基本上遵从"政治问题"原则、"一个声音"原则及"一个中国"规范进行判决。在外国法院判决中,台湾当局丧失了或缺乏代表中国的权利,其在中国台湾地区的行为能力和管辖效力得到部分认可,台湾当局的诉讼当事人能力有时也被接受,具有一定程度的权宜性程序行为能力;台湾的法律身份仍是中国的一部分,而中华人民共和国政府之于台湾的主权权利也被尊重;所谓"中华民国"或台湾的"国家地位"并不被支持,也不具有一般性的实体权利能力;台湾在某些判决中得以参照适用"功能性豁免权",但这些不等于法院默认或支持所谓台湾"事实独立"及其主张。

Foreign courts basically comply with the principles of＂political issue＂and＂one voice＂and the standard of＂one China＂in judgment when it comes to the typical verdict involving the legal status of Taiwan. In the judicial decision of foreign courts,the Taiwan authorities have lost or lacked the right to represent China,but their behavior ability and jurisdiction validity in Taiwan are partly recognized and their litigant capacity is sometimes accepted with a certain degree of expedient procedural capacity. On the other hand,the legal status of Taiwan is still recognized as part of China while the sovereignty of the People＇s Republic of China over Taiwan is also respected. The so-called ＂statehood＂ of ＂Republic of China＂or Taiwan is not sustained in foreign courts,nor does it have general substantive rights. Even though Taiwan has also been able to refer to the application of ＂functional immunity＂in certain judgments these do not mean that the court acquiesces or supports the so-called ＂de facto independence＂of Taiwan and its claims.