民国文学史著作中的“李杜优劣论”——以曾毅《中国文学史》中“李杜优劣论”为中心

On“Who is Better,Li Bai or Du Fu?”in Literature History of the Republic of China:With That in History of Chinses Literature by Zeng Yi as an Example

民国时期的文学史著作对"李杜优劣论"这一公案进行了书写。一些文学史著作在继承古人的相关论述中偶有新见。曾毅《中国文学史》中的李杜"比较论"因其独创性与合理性,成为本时期文学史著作中关于李杜优劣最具价值、影响最为深远的论述。此外,胡适的内容价值论,顾实的审美批评论,郑宾于、郭绍虞的复古与开新之辨,苏雪林、陈子展的"造境"与"写境"之辨,都可圈可点,独具价值。

The debate of ＂Who is Better,Li Bai or Du Fu？＂is recorded in literature history of the republic of China. Some works have their own opinions besides the sincere recording of ancestors＇ ideas. Zeng Yi＇s opinion,expressed in his History of Chinses Literature,is the most valuable and influential illustration due to its originality and rationality. Moreover,Hu shi＇s idea on the value of content,Gu Shi＇s opinion on aesthetic criticism,Zheng Bin-yu and Guo Shao-yu＇s thoughts on back-to-the-ancient ideology and innovation,Su Xue-lin and Chen Zi-zhan＇s debate on creation and depict are all worth to read and valuable.