期刊文献+

6种微创方法治疗598例输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 被引量:14

Efficacy comparison of 6 different minimal invasive methods in the treatment of upper ureteric stone in 598 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析输尿管镜碎石术(URL)、输尿管软镜碎石术(fURL)、URL+N-Trap、体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、微创经皮肾镜取石术(m PCNL)和后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术(RLU)6种微创方法治疗输尿管上段结石的临床效果,以突出显示微创治疗输尿管上段结石的作用,为最佳微创治疗方法的选择提供参考。方法:对行URL 186例、f URL 39例,URL+N-Trap 149例、ESWL 131例,m PCNL 58例和RLU 35例输尿管上段结石病人的临床资料进行分析。结果:URL、f URL、URL+N-Trap、ESWL、m PCNL和RLU治疗输尿管上段结石碎石成功率分别为60.2%、92.3%、89.9%、93.9%、96.6%和97.1%。f URL、URL+N-Trap、ESWL、m PCNL和RLU对输尿管上段结石治疗成功率类似(P>0.05),均明显高于URL(60.2%)(P<0.01)。但URL、fURL、URL+N-Trap、不适合结石下方输尿管呈N形弯曲或进镜困难者。ESWL对≤10 mm结石病人一次成功碎石率高于>10 mm结石病人(P<0.01),但ESWL也不适合结石下方有息肉或狭窄者。结论:单用URL治疗输尿管上段结石碎石成功率低,可采用f URL或URL前预置N-Trap来提高碎石的成功率。各种微创手术治疗输尿管上段结石各有利弊,对微创方法治疗输尿管上段结石的选择应根据结石所在输尿管部位、结石大小、合并输尿管病变和具备输尿管镜辅助设备情况来决定。 Objective: To analyze the clinical effects of the urteroscopic lithotripsy( URL),flexible urteroscopic lithotripsy( fURL),URL combined with N-Trap,extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy( ESWL),mini-percustaneous nephrolithotomy( m PCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic urterotomy( RLU) in the treatment of upper ureteric stones for providing the reference in selecting the best treatment means of upper ureteric stones. Methods: The clinical data of 186 cases treated with URL,39 cases treated with f URL,149 cases treated with URL combined with N-Trap,131 cases treated with ESWL,58 cases treated with m PCNL and 35 cases treated with PLU were analyzed. Results: The success rates of URL,f URL,URL combined with N-Trap,ESWL,m PCNL and RLU in treating upper ureteric stones were 60. 2%,92. 3%,89. 9%,93. 9%,96. 6% and 97. 1%,respectively. The differences of the success rates of f URL,URL combined with N-Trap,ESWL,m PCNL and RLU in treating upper ureteric stones were not statistically significant( P〉0. 05),and which was significanly higher than that of URL( P〈0. 01). The URL,f URL and URL combined with N-Trap were not suitable for the patients with N-shape bending ureter or failure to access below ureteral calculi. The once success rate of ESWL in patients with stone diameter ≤10 mm was higher than that in patients with stone diameter 〉10 mm( P〈0. 01),and the ESWL was not suitable for patients with polyp or stricture below the ureteral calculi. Conclusions: The once success rate of single-use URL in treating upper ureteral calculi is low,and the f URL or URL combined with N-Trap can improve the success rate of lithotripsy. Selecting the minimal invasive method to treat upper ureteric stone should be based on the stone location,size,complicated with ureter diseases and ureteroscopy auxiliary equipment.
作者 刘定益 俞家顺 黄滔 楚晨龙 沈鑫源 王健 唐崎 周燕峰 李文敏 王名伟 周文龙 LIU Ding-yi;YU Jia-shun;HUANG Tao;CHU Chen-long;SHEN xin-yuan;WANG Jian;TANG Qi;ZHOU Yan-teng;LI Wen-rain;WANG Ming-wei;ZHOU Wen-long(Department of Urology,Shanghai Punan Hospital,Shanghai 200125;Department of Urology,The Affiliated Ruijing Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200025,China)
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2018年第5期585-588,共4页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
基金 上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点学科建设资助(PWZX2014-19) 上海市浦东新区科委科技发展基金创新资助(PKJ2013-y34)
关键词 输尿管结石 输尿管镜碎石术 体外冲击波碎石术 微创经皮肾镜取石术 腹腔镜切开取石术 ureteric stone urteroscopic lithotripsy flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy mini-percustaneous nephrolithotomy retroperitoneal laparoseopie ureterotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

  • 1张泽,李逊,夏明义,汤凤玲,龙腾,陈贵珍,冯桂萍,欧莉莉,吴开俊.复式脉冲低能量体外冲击碎石术治疗上尿路结石(附717例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2004,25(7):448-449. 被引量:42
  • 2李文平,郭跃先,王伟,魏志其,杨士杰,郭铁,马建国,李辉.气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(7):449-450. 被引量:56
  • 3黄锦坤,李逊,吴开俊,袁坚,罗金泰.3种不同术式治疗复杂输尿管上段结石的疗效比较——随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(2):103-105. 被引量:123
  • 4韩海,李逊,吴志坚,钟浩光.ESWL治疗原位输尿管结石失败的原因及处理[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(6):475-476. 被引量:5
  • 5Kurahashi T, Miyake H, Oka N,et al. Clinical out- come of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for 2129 patients with ureteral stones[J]. Urol Res, 2007,35 (3) : 149 - 153.
  • 6Safwat A S, Bissada N K, Kumar U,et al. Uretero- scopic holmium laser lithotripsy in patients with renal impairment[J]. Int Uroi Nephrol, 2008,40 ( 1 ) : 15 - 17.
  • 7Feng M I, Tamaddon K,Mikhail A, et al. Prospec- tive randomized study of various techniques of .percu- taneou nephrolithotomy[J]. Urology, 2001, 58:345 -350.
  • 8Juan Y S,Shen J T,Li C C,et al. Comparison of per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic litho- tripsy in the management of impacted,large, proximal ureteral stones[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2008,24: 204-209.
  • 9Wu C F,Chen C S. Lin W Y,et al. Therapeutic op- tions for proximal ureter stone: extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid reterorenoscope with holmium: yltrium aluminum garnet,laser litho- tripsy[J]. Urology,2005,65:1075- 1079.
  • 10Jiang H,Wu Z, Ding Q, et al. Ureteroscopie treat- ment of ureteral calculi with holmium : YAG laser lithotripsy[J]. J Endourol, 2007,21(2):51 -54.

共引文献198

同被引文献168

引证文献14

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部