期刊文献+

高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓小脑性共济失调3型(SCA3)患者运动症状的疗效评估 被引量:3

Efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor symptoms in patients with Spinocerebellar ataxia 3(SCA3)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓小脑性共济失调3型(SCA3)患者运动症状的疗效。方法:将36例SCA3患者随机分为3组:高频A组(接受频率为10Hz的经颅磁刺激)、高频B组(接受频率为5Hz的经颅磁刺激)、伪刺激组(使用无实际刺激作用的伪线圈),刺激部位为双侧小脑半球区域,每周治疗5天,共治疗4周。在基线期、及治疗4周终点使用共济失调等级量表(SARA)对患者运动症状进行评估。结果:经过4周干预,高频A组和高频B组患者SARA量表总分及站立子项得分有明显下降,其治疗前后差值与假刺激组相比有统计学差异(P<0.05);高频A组与高频B组之间无明显差异。结论:高频重复经颅磁刺激可改善SCA3患者部分运动症状,可作为SCA3患者的对症治疗方法。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(r TMS) on motor symptoms in SCA3 patients. Methods: Thirty-six SCA3 patients were randomly assigned into High Frequency A group, High frequency B group, Sham group(n=12 subjects per group). Patients received either a frequency of 10 Hz(High Frequency A group), 5 Hz(High frequency B group), or sham(Sham group) of stimulation in the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere for 4 weeks(5 times per week). Motor symptoms were evaluated at baseline, and the end of 4 weeks therapy, using the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia(SARA). Results: After 4 weeks of intervention, the total score and the‘stand'subitem score of SARA were reduced in the High frequency A group and B group(P0.05), compared with Sham group. No differences were observed between High frequency A group and B group. Conclusions: Application of high-frequency r TMS can improve motor symptoms in SCA3 patients,and may be applied as a symptomatic treatment in SCA3.
作者 魏飞飞 郑丽君 王静 樊冰倩 孙丹丹 彭焱 蔡华安 WEI Fei-fei;ZHENG Li-jun;WANG Jing;FAN Bing-qian;SUN Dan-dan;PENG Yan;CAI Hua-an(Hunan Provincial People's Hospital(First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha Hunan 410016)
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2018年第16期14-15,18,共3页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 脊髓小脑性共济失调3型 经颅磁刺激 运动症状 Spinocerebellar ataxia 3 transcranial magnetic stimulation movement symptoms
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献96

  • 1Matilla-Duenas A, Sanchez I, Con'al-Juan M, et al. Cellular and molecular pathways triggering neurodegeneration in the spi- nocerebellar ataxias[ J ]. Cerebellum, 2010,9 (2) : 148-166.
  • 2Yoshida K, Shindzu Y, Morita H, et al. Severity and progres- sion rate of cerebellar ataxia in 16q-linked autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (16q-ADCA) in the endemic Nagano Area of Japan [ J ]. Cerebellum, 2009,8 ( 1 ) :46-51.
  • 3Harding A E. Classification of the hereditary ataxias and para- plegias[J]. Lancet, 1983,1(8334) :1151-1155.
  • 4Maruyama H, Kawakami H, Nakamura S. Reevaluation of the exact CAG repeat length in hereditary cerebellar ataxias using highly denaturing conditions and long PCR [ J ]. Hum Genet, 1996,97 (5) :591-595.
  • 5Basri R, Yabe I, Soma H, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia in Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan : a study of 113 Japanese tamilies[ J ]. J Hum Genet, 2007,52(10) :848-855.
  • 6van Swieten J C, Brusse E, de Graaf BM, et al. A mutation in the fibroblast growth factor 14 gene is associated with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia [ corrected] [ J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2003,72( 1 ) :191-199.
  • 7Schmitz-HObsch T, du Montcel S T, Baliko L, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clini- cal scale[ J]. Neurology, 2006, 66( 11 ) : 1717-1720.
  • 8Weyer A, Abele M, Sehmitz-Htibsch T, et al. Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a study in 64 ataxia patients [ J ]. Mov Disord, 2007, 22 ( 11 ) : 1633-1637.
  • 9Yabe I, Matsushima M, Soma H, et al. Usefulness of the scale for assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) [ J ]. J Neurol Sci, 2008, 266 ( 1/2 ) : 164-166.
  • 10Mascalchi M, Tosetti M, Plasmati R, et al. Proton magneticresonance spectroscopy in an Italian family with spinacerebellar ataxia type 1 [J]. Ann Neurol, 1998, 43(2) :244-252.

共引文献45

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部