摘要
本文着重解释以下问题:假设民主国家中的族群运动都展现出近似的不满和主张,那么什么因素可以解释运动的差异和变种?尤其是,为何有的运动向暴力化发展,而有的则保持和平状态?并且为何有的表现出了长期的相对稳定性,而其他的则昙花一现?在抗争性政治视野下,我们运用新的动态研究范式来分析族群动员问题。基于此,我们主张根据族群运动的制度化程度来研究族群动员的差异和变种是最好的研究路径。基于深入研究加拿大魁北克讲法语人的运动案例,本文发展了制度性族群民族主义谱系概念,以便更好地解释多样性的动员模式。
This article tackles the following questions ; given that ethnic movements in democ -
racies often exhibit similar grievances and claims f what explains variations in their patterns of ethnic
mobilization ? Speci ? cally f why do some ethnic movements turn to violence while others remain non
- violent f and why do some demonstrate relative sustainability over long historic periods while others
experience temporary ? are - ups followed by long periods of demobilization ? Utilizing new research
in contentious politics f this study advances a dynamic approach to the examination of ethnic mobili -
zation f arguing that variations in mobilization patterns are best analyzed according to the extent of a
movement institutionalization . Illustrating the utility of this analytical framework with an in - depth
analysis of the case of the Francophone Québécois f this article develops the concept of a spectrum of
institutional eth no national ism in order to explain diverse mobilization patterns .
出处
《贵州省党校学报》
2018年第4期47-55,共9页
Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School
基金
国家社科基金西部项目:"民主化过程中民族冲突和整合机制研究"(项目编号:16XZZ009
主持人:丁岭杰)
和课题国社科青年项目:"跨境佤族的历史记忆与国家认同研究"(项目编号:17CMZ004
主持人:王燕)的阶段性成果
关键词
族群动员
抗争政治
民主制
制度化
法语魁北克人
ethnic mobilization
contentious politics
demoeracy
institutionalization
Francophone Québécois