期刊文献+

跨学科研究在科学研究中越来越重要? 被引量:23

Is interdisciplinary research becoming more important in science?
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着科学系统的复杂化,许多社会问题和科学研究计划无法由一个学科解决,跨学科研究逐渐成为现代科学研究不可或缺的模式。因此,分析与了解科学中跨学科研究的变化趋势,阐明跨学科研究的重要性对跨学科研究的持续发展和科技规划具有重要的意义。该研究以Web of Science数据库1961-2015年高被引论文数据(top 1%)为基础,分别利用第三代生物多样性指标Leinster-Cobbold多样性指数(LCDiv)和单项跨学科指标(丰富性、均衡性和差异度)分析跨学科研究的变化趋势。研究表明跨学科研究对科学研究越来越重要,跨学科研究的丰富性呈现出明显的上升趋势,均衡性呈现下降趋势,大多数学科的差异度呈现上升趋势,同时也表明高被引论文的高丰富性、低均衡性和高差异度的跨学科特性正变得越来越明显。 With the complexity of the scientific system,many social problems and scientific research programs cannot be solved by one discipline,and interdisciplinary research has become an indispensable model of modern science. It is of great significance for the development of interdisciplinary research to explore the importance and evolution trend of interdisciplinary research. Based on over 50-year high-cited papers( top 1%) of the Web of Science,this study uses the third biodiversity index,the Leinster-Cobbold diversity indices( LCDiv),and interdisciplinary property indices,namely Variety,Balance and Disparity,to analyze the evolutionary trends of interdisciplinary research. The study shows that interdisciplinary research is becoming more important in science,variety shows an increasing trend,balance shows a decreasing trend and disparity shows an increasing trend for most disciplines. The analysis also shows that the interdisciplinary characteristics of highly cited papers,namely high variety,low balance and high disparity,is becoming more and more evident over time.
作者 陈仕吉 康温和 江文森 CHEN Shi-ji;Clement Arsenault;Vincent Lariviere(China Agricultural University Library,Beijing 100193,China;School of Library and Information Science,University of Montreal,Montreal,Quebec,Canada,H3T3J7;Observatory of Science and Technology(OST),Interuniversity Center for Research on Science and Technology(CIRST),University of Quebec in Montreal,Montreal,QC,Canada H3C 3P8)
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1153-1160,1195,共9页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BTQ070)
关键词 跨学科研究 跨学科性 高被引论文 Leinster-Cobbold多样性指数 interdisciplinary research interdisciplinarity highly cited papers Leinster- Cobbold diversity indices
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献69

  • 1Zhuge H. A Knowledge Flow Model for Peer-to- peer Team Knowledge Sharing and Management [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2002,23:23 -30.
  • 2Arvanitis S, Kubli U, Woerter M. University-industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland: What University Scien- tists Think about Co-operation with Private Enterprises E J]. Re- search Policy,2008,37(10) :1865-1883.
  • 3Luo J H,Yin S J. A Synthesis on Enterprise Knowledge Transfer C M J. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing ,2008.
  • 4Paci R,Usai S. Knowledge Flows Across European Regions E Jl. Annals of Regional Science,2009,43 ( 3 ) :669-690.
  • 5Nomaler O, Verspagen B. Knowledge Flows, Patent Citations and the Impact of Science on Technology E J J. Economic Systems Research ,2008,20 (4) :339-366.
  • 6Yan E. Finding Knowledge Paths Among Scientific Disciplines [ J ]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology ,2014,65( 11 ) :2331-2347.
  • 7Bordons M, Morillo F, Gomez I. Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Research Through Bibliometric Tools E C ]. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research,2004:437-456.
  • 8Pierce S J. Boundary Crossing in Research Literatures as a Means of Interdisciplinary Information Transfer [ J ]. Journal of the A- merican Society for Information Science, 1999,50 ( 3 ) : 271 - 279.
  • 9Mena-Chalco J P,Digiampietri L A,Lopes F M,et al. Brazilian Bibliometric Coauthorship Networks [ J]. Journal of the Associa- tion for Information Science and Technology,2014,65 (7) :1424 - 1445.
  • 10Lepair C. Switching between Academic Disciplines in Universities in the Netherlands I Jl, Sciantometrics, 1980,2 (3) : 177-191.

共引文献28

同被引文献260

引证文献23

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部