期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

大学生思想成熟度差异性调查分析

Investigation on the Difference of Ideological Maturity Between College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对大学生思想成熟度参差不齐的现状,采用问卷调查法及统计学原理的研究方法分析,认为大学生思想成熟度与其性别关系不大,但在入学前后、在接受教育过程中与教师、不同院校和专业等因素对他们的思想成熟度影响差异显著。 In this study, the questionnaire and statistical analysis was used to investigate difference of ideological maturity between college students. The results showed that there is no correlation between ideological maturity and gender, but student＇s admission to college, their interaction with teachers, attending different colleges as well as different majors have significant influence on ideological maturity.
作者 史一强 SHI Yi-Qiang(Ideological and Political Department,Fujian Vocational College of Art,Fuzhou 350012,China)
机构地区 福建艺术职业学院思想政治与理论课教学部
出处 《天津中德应用技术大学学报》 2018年第3期69-72,共4页 Journal of Tianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences
关键词 大学生 思想成熟度 差异性调查 College Students Ideological Maturity Diiterential Investigation
分类号 C711 [社会学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1彭台光 高月慈 林钲芩.管理研究中的共同方法变异-问题本质、影响、测试和补救[J].管理学报,2006,.
  • 2Bagozzi, R. P. , & Yi, Y. ( 1991 ). Muhitrait - muhimethod matri- ces in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426 - 439.
  • 3Becker,T. E. , & Cote, J. A. (1994). Additive and muhiplicative method effects in applied psychological research:An empirical assessment of three models. Journal of Management ,20 ( 3 ) , 625 - 641.
  • 4Bollen,K. A. ,& Ting,K. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indi- cators. Psychological Methods ,5( 1 ) ,3 - 22.
  • 5Brief, A. P. , Burke, M. J. , George, J. M. , Robinson, B. S. , & Webster,J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an un- measured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 73 ( 2), 193 - 198.
  • 6Campbell, D. T. , & O' Connell, E. J. (1967). Methods factors in multitrait - multimethod matrices: multiplicative rather than additive? Multivariate Behavioral Research ,2 (4) ,409 - 426.
  • 7Conway,J. M. , & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organi- zational research. Journal of Business and Psychology,25 ( 3 ), 325 - 334.
  • 8. Cote, J. A. , & Buckley, M. R. ( 1987 ). Estimating trait, method,and error variance:Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research,24,315 - 318.
  • 9Doty,D. H. , & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organiza- tional Research Methods ,1 (4) ,374 -406.
  • 10Fiske, D. W. (1982). Convergent - discriminant validation in measurements and research strategies. In D. Brinbirg & L. H. Kidder( Eds. ), Forms of validity in research ( pp. 77 - 92 ). San Francisco: Jossey - Bass.

共引文献20

天津中德应用技术大学学报
2018年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部