期刊文献+

血清癌胚抗原水平与免疫组化指标对肺癌患者EGFR基因突变的预测价值 被引量:9

The predictive value of serum CEA and immunohistochemical markers on EGFR gene mutation in patients with lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清癌胚抗原(CEA)与免疫组化指标对肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变的预测价值。方法检测90例肺癌患者血清CEA水平及与肿瘤组织免疫组化指标细胞角蛋白(CK)、甲状腺转录因子-1(TTF-1)及P63基因表达情况。同时检测肿瘤组织EGFR基因表型,分析不同EGFR基因表型患者血清CEA水平与免疫组化指标表达的差异及相关指标对EGFR基因突变预测效能。结果 EGFR基因突变组患者血清CEA水平明显高于EGFR基因野生组(P<0.05);以CEA≥5 ng/m L为阳性,EGFR基因突变组CEA阳性率明显高于EGFR基因野生组(P<0.01)。EGFR基因突变组患者CK、TTF-1表达阳性率明显高于EGFR基因野生组,而EGFR基因突变组P63表达阴性率明显高于EGFR基因野生组(P<0.01)。血清CEA水平(以CEA≥5 ng/m L为阳性)预测EGFR基因突变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度分别是94.1%、50.0%、53.3%、93.3%、66.7%。CK(+)预测EGFR基因突变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度分别是100%、51.7%、55.7%、100%、70%。TTF-1(+)预测EGFR基因突变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度分别是100%、44.6%、52.3%、100%、65.6%。P63(-)预测EGFR基因突变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度分别是100%、46.4%、53.1%、100%、66.7%。结论高水平CEA及CK(+)、TTF-1(+)及P63(-)往往提示EGFR基因突变,血清CEA水平及免疫组化指标CK、TTF-1及P63是重要的EGFR基因突变的预测指标,在基因检测受限的情况下具有重要临床应用价值。
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 2018年第14期2200-2203,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1王金万,孙燕.重组人血管内皮抑素Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国医疗前沿,2006(3):87-90. 被引量:5
  • 2Sheffield BS, Bosdet IE, All RH, et al. Relationship of thyroid transcription factor 1 to EGFR status in non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Curr oncol, 2014, 21(6): 305-308.
  • 3E1-Zammar OA, Zhang S, Katzenstein AL. Comparison of FISH, PCR, and try in assessing EGFR status in lung adenocarcinoma and correlation with clinicopathologic features [ J ]. Diagn mol pathol, 2009, 18 (3) : 133-137.
  • 4Ao MH, Zhang H, Sakowski L, et al. The utility of a novel triple marker(combination of TYF1, napsin A, and p40) in the sub- classification of non-small cell lung cancer [ J ]. Hum pathol, 2014, 45(5) : 926-934.
  • 5Sun PL, Seol H, Lee HJ, et al. High incidence of EGFR muta- tions in Korean men smokers with no intratumoral heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinomas: correlation with histologic subtypes, EG- FR/TFF-1 expressions, and clinical features [ J ]. J Thorac Oncol, 2012, 7(2): 323-330.
  • 6Peterson MR, Piao Z, Bazhenova LA, et al. Terminal respiratory unit type lung adenocarcinoma is associated with distinctive EGFR immunoreactivity and EGFR mutations[ J]. Appl Immuno- histochem lVlol Morphol, 2007, 15(3) : 242-247.
  • 7Yatabe Y,Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. Epidermal growth factor re- ceptor gene amplification is acquired in association with tumor progression of EGFR-mutated lung cancer [ J ]. Cancer Res, 2008, 68(7) :2106-2111.
  • 8Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors : guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology [ J ]. J Mol Di- an. 2013_ 15(4") ,415-453.
  • 9孙燕,吴一龙,李龙芸,廖美琳,蒋国梁,EdwardS. Kim,Jean-YvesDouillard,Tsveta Milenkova.吉非替尼或多西他赛治疗一线化疗失败的非小细胞肺癌的临床分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2011,33(5):377-380. 被引量:25
  • 10中国非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体基因突变检测专家共识[J].中华病理学杂志,2011,40(10):700-702. 被引量:64

共引文献138

同被引文献93

引证文献9

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部