期刊文献+

NEM异质性、上下游嵌入与东道国GVC分工地位

NEM Heterogeneity, Upstream or Downstream Embedding and Host Country's GVC Division Status
原文传递
导出
摘要 在全球价值链(GVC)分工日益深化的背景下,国际非股权形式(NEM)逐渐成为企业参与GVC分工的重要形式。本文借鉴Antràs和Chor(2013)的不完全契约产权模型,分析NEM异质性对东道国GVC分工地位的影响机制,并对具体影响途径进行了分解。同时,运用2000—2014年43个经济体的跨国面板数据进行实证检验。研究结果表明:模块型和关联型NEM提高GVC前向参与,促进东道国GVC分工地位提升;俘获型NEM则降低GVC前向参与,抑制东道国GVC分工地位提升;NEM异质性对GVC分工地位的影响取决于前向参与和后向参与的净效应,且前向参与效应大于后向参与效应。本文在此基础上提出了有助于促进模块型和关联型NEM发展的政策建议。 With the increasing division of GVC, international Non-Equity Modes (NEM) have gradually become an important form for enterprises to participate in GVCs. Based on the Incomplete Contracts Property-Rights Model of Antas and Chor (2013), this paper analyzes the influence mechanism of NEM heterogeneity on GVC division status, and decomposes the specific impact path. This paper makes an empirical test by using the international panel data of 43 economies from 2000 to 2014. The results show that Modular and Relational NEMs improve forward participation in the GVC and thus promote host countries' GVC division status. Captive NEMs reduce forward participation and restrain host countries' GVC division status. The impact of NEM heterogeneity on GVC division status depends on the net effect of forward and backward participation. Based on the findings, this paper puts forward policy suggestions to promote the development of Modular and Relational NEM.
作者 齐俊妍 聂燕峰 QI Junyan;NIE Yanfeng
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期82-94,共13页 Journal of International Trade
基金 2018年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“高质量发展阶段服务业开放对中国产业结构升级的影响研究”(18AJY012).
关键词 国际非股权形式 不完全契约 GVC前向参与 GVC后向参与 International Non-Equity Modes (NEM) Incomplete Contracts GVC Forward Participation GVC Backward Participation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Acemoglu, D. , S. Johnson, J. A.. Robinson, The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development : An Empirical Investigation. American E-conomic Review, 2001,91 (5) : 1369-1401.
  • 2Acemoglu, D. , P. Antr~s, E.. Helpman. Contracts and Technology Adoption. American Economic Review, 2007, 97 ( 3 ) : 916-943.
  • 3Banga, R.. Measuring value in global value chains. UNCTAD Background Paper, Geneva: United Nations (http ://unctad. org/en/Publi- cations Library/ecidc2013miscl bpS. pdf) , 2013.
  • 4Costinot, A.. On the Origins of Comparative Advantage. Journal of International Economics, 2009, 77 (2) : 255-264.
  • 5Feenstra, R. C.. Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Globle Economy. Journal of Economic Perspective, 1998, 12 (4) : 31-50.
  • 6Fecnstra, R. C. , C. Hong, H. Ma, et al.. Contractual versus Non-contractual Trade: The Role of Institutions in China. Journal of Eco- nomic Behavior & Organization, 2013, 94 : 281-294.
  • 7Hansen, B. E.. Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation ,Testing and Inference. Journal of Economics, 1999, 93 : 345-368.
  • 8Hummels, D. , J. Ishii, K. M. Yi. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialisation in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54(1): 75-96.
  • 9Hausmann, R. , J. Hwang, D.. Rodrik. What You Export Matters. NBER Working Paper, No. 11905, 2005.
  • 10Koopman, R. , W. Powers, Z. Wang,S. -J. ,Wei. Give Credit Where Credit is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Paper, No. 16426, 2010.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部