期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术治疗老年急性胆囊炎效果及安全性比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Effect and Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Laparotomy in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的手术效果及安全性。方法选取2015年10月—2017年10月解放军148医院普外科收治的老年急性胆囊炎患者106例为研究对象,将接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的53例患者设为观察组,将接受开腹手术的53例患者设为对照组,比较两组患者手术相关指标、并发症及生活质量。结果观察组术中出血量、术后住院时间分别为(64.73±16.59)mL、(6.83±2.65)d,均明显少于对照组(t=9.262、6.763,P<0.05);并发症发生率(3.77%)明显低于对照组(18.87%)(χ~2=6.014,P<0.05);总体健康、精神状况、社会活动、躯体疼痛评分分别为(85.12±1.15)分、(86.37±1.26)分、(90.11±1.24)分、(87.24±0.45)分,均明显高于对照组(t=60.209、82.272、45.190、54.494,P<0.05)。结论对老年急性胆囊炎患者实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术,创伤小、并发症少、术后恢复快,有助于提高生活质量。 Objective To compare the effect and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods A total of 106 cases of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to the general surgery department of the 148 Hospital of PLA from October 2015 to October 2017 were selected as the research objects, and divided into two groups with 53 cases in each, the observation group of patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, while the control group underwent laparotomy and the operation related indexes, complications and quality of life between the two groups were compared. Results The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative length of stay in observation group were respectively(64.73±16.59)mL and(6.83±2.65)d, significantly less than those in control group(t=9.262, 6.763, P〈 0.05); the incidence rate of complications was 3.77%, significantly lower than 18.87% in the control group(χ2=6.014,P〈 0.05); the scores of general health, mental condition, social activities and body pain were respectively(85.12±1.15) points,(86.37±1.26)points,(90.11 ±1.24)points and(87.24 ±0.45) points, significantly higher than those in control group(t=60.209, 82.272, 45.190, 54.494, P〈 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treating elderly patients with acute cholecystitis has the advantages of less trauma, few complications and fast recovery after operation, which is of help to improving the quality of life.
作者 王乃金 WANG Nai-jin(Department of General Surgery,PLA 148th Hospital,Zibo,Shandong Province,255300 China)
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《系统医学》 2018年第6期70-72,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 开腹手术 老年急性胆囊炎 效果 安全性 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparotomy Acute cholecystitis in the elderly Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献94

  • 1毛先海,吴金术,李灼日,周力学.老年性急性结石性胆囊炎的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(6):883-884. 被引量:6
  • 2舒志红.腹腔镜胆囊炎切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎中的临床研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2014,7(10):11-12.
  • 3沙娜.急性腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年结石性胆囊炎的临床研究[J].医药前沿,2013,1(23):7-9.
  • 4陆间广.急性腹腔镜切除术治疗老年结石性胆囊炎临床分析[J].医学信息旬刊,2013,26(12):11-12.
  • 5Lee R, Mason A, Nta N. Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption[J]. Science, 2014, 346(626): 229.
  • 6Agrusa A, Romano G, Frazzetta G, et al. Role and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12 (Suppl 2): $37.
  • 7Kurbanov F S, Aliev 1, Chinnikov M A, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in case of acute cholecystitis [J]. Khirurgiia(Mosk), 2014(2): 16.
  • 8Ferrarese A G, Solej M, Enrico S, et al. Elective and emergencylaparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly:our experience[J]. BMC Surg, 2013,13(Suppl 2): $21.
  • 9Hartwig W, Buchler M W. Acute cholecystitis:early versus delayedsurgery[J]. Adv Surg, 2014, 48:155.
  • 10Gurusamy K S, Davidson C, Gluud C, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for People with acute cholecystitis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, 6:CD005d40.

共引文献328

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部