期刊文献+

传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效分析 被引量:1

Clinical Effect of Traditional Hemorrhoidectomy on Hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析讨论对痔疮病人采用传统痔疮切除术的具体效果和临床价值。方法:选取某院2015年10月~2017年10月痔疮病人48例,根据入院先后将其均分为对照组和观察组,每组24例。对照组使用地榆槐角丸结合马应龙麝香痔疮栓治疗,观察组使用传统痔疮切除术治疗,比较两组病人起效时间、治疗后3月排泄时VAS疼痛评分和总有效率。结果:治疗前,两组病人排泄时VAS疼痛评分无差异,P>0.05;治疗后,观察组起效时间和排泄时VAS疼痛评分明显优于对照组,P<0.05。观察组和对照组总有效率依次为95.84%和79.16%,观察组明显高于对照组,P<0.05。结论:传统痔疮切除术能快速见效,并且大幅度降低病人疼痛感,整体治疗效果高于药物治疗,可在各大医院中推广使用。 Objective:To analyze and discuss the specific effect and clinical value of traditional hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoids patients.Methods:48 cases of hemorrhoid patients treated in a hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to the admission,with 24 cases in each group.The control group was treated with Diyu Huaijiao pills combined with Ma Yinglong Shexiang hemorrhoid suppository,and the observation group was treated with traditional hemorrhoidectomy,then the onset time,VAS pain score and total effective rate at 3 months after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results:Before treatment,there was no difference in VAS pain score between the two groups during excretion(P〈0.05).After treatment,the VAS pain score of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(P〈0.05).The total effective rates of the observation group and the control group were 95.84% and 79.16% respectively,and the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The traditional hemorrhoidectomy is effective quickly and can greatly reduce the pain of the patients.The overall therapeutic effect is higher than that of the drug treatment.It can be widely used in various hospitals.
作者 张大鹏 Zhang Dapeng(Department of General Surgery, Sanzao Health Center, Jinwan District, Zhuhai 51900)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2018年第8期1161-1162,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 传统痔疮切除 痔疮 疗效分析 traditional hemorrhoidectomy hemorrhoids curative effect analysis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献28

  • 1胡莹莹.两种手术方法治疗重度痔疮的临床效果比较观察[J].云南中医药杂志,2013,24(11):232-235.
  • 2许绍洋.双乌止痛散与止痛栓用于痔疮术后患者的临床效果分析[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2011,34(4):46-47.
  • 3张绍英.两种止痛药用于痔疮术后患者的临床效果比较观察[J].华中科技大学学报,2012,35(13):25-26.
  • 4郑远红.吻合器痔上黏膜环切除术治疗重度痔疮的临床优劣分析[J].中华外科杂志,2014,36(15):2643-2644.
  • 5姚志轩.不同方法治疗重度痔疮的临床优劣对比分析[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2012,28(16):372-374.
  • 6侯化森.PPH结合痔切除与开放式外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的比较研究.医药前沿,2013,14(34):104-106.
  • 7.郝东鹏,闰新雍.吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效对比研究.中国中医药科技,2014,21(1):19-20.
  • 8夏克龙.吻合器痔上粘膜环切术与传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效对比研究.医学信息,2015,28(26):249-250.
  • 9伍剑飞,黄雪卿.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)治疗痔疮的应用体会[J].海南医学,2009,20(1):82-84. 被引量:19
  • 10訾敬中.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗42例重度痔疮临床观察[J].中国当代医药,2009,16(12):53-54. 被引量:5

共引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部