摘要
当学界把焦点集中于政府信息公开"三安全一稳定""国家秘密""商业秘密""个人隐私""过程性信息""内部信息"等政府信息公开例外条款的研究,以及信息公开的司法审查问题时,忽视了这样一种现象:创制性信息中的一类,即行政机关依法应当创制的政府信息被2011年实施的《最高人民法院关于审理政府信息公开行政案件若干问题的规定》,以排除受案范围的方式,通过"立法型"的司法解释拒之于政府信息公开之门外。这是对公众知情权与监督权的侵犯,造成申请者对此类信息的权利真空,有违《政府信息公开条例》的终极立法目的。
When the focus point is concentrated on the research on exceptionclauses with respect to disclosure of government information,such as"three-securities and one-stability""state secret""business secret""individual privacy""process information"and"internal information",as well as the judicial review on information disclosure,there is one phenomenon ignored.Namely,one kind of formulated information,i.e.the government information ought to be formulated by administrative body by law,was not disclosed under the"legislated"judicial interpretation since such information was excluded from the scope of accepting cases as stated in the Stipulation of the Supreme People's Court for Several Problems on Hearing the Administrative Cas of Government Information Disclosure(2011)(hereinafter referred to as the Stipulation).This phenomenon infringes the public's right to know and supervise so that applicant becomes unavailable to access to such information.This goes against the ultimate legislative intent of the Regulation on Disclosure of Government Information(hereinafter referred to as the Regulation).As a result,"formulated"information becomes a part concealed from the disclosure of government information,so we need break out the vaccum to release the rights.
作者
王可利
WANG Keli(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023,Chin)
出处
《周口师范学院学报》
CAS
2018年第4期89-94,共6页
Journal of Zhoukou Normal University
关键词
信息公开
创制性信息
司法解释
行政行为
合法性
information disclosure
formulated information
judicial interpretation
administrative behavior
legality