期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌的疗效及对患者胃肠功能和生活质量的影响 被引量:9

Clinical effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in colorectal cancer and its effect on gastrointestinal function and quality of life
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究结直肠癌采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院84例结直肠癌根治患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将其分为观察组(n=38,腹腔镜手术)和对照组(n=46,开腹手术)。比较两组治疗效果。结果与对照组相比,观察组手术时间更长,术中出血量和输血量更少,输血率更低(P<0.05);观察组术后首次进食时间、排气时间和下床活动时间及住院时间短于对照组,QLQ-C30评分高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜结直肠癌根治具有创伤小、并发症少等优势,患者术后康复效果和生活质量更好。 Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopy and laparotomy in colorectal cancer. Methods Theclinical data of 84 patients with radical resection of colorectal cancer in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Thepatients were divided into observation group (n=38, laparoscopic surgery) and control group (n=46, laparotomy) accordingto the operation methods. The treatment effects were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with thecontrol group, there were longer operation time, less itraoperative blood loss and amount of blood transfusion, and lowerblood transfusion rate in the observation group(P〈0.05). The postoperative first time of eating, the first exhaust time, firstambulation time and the average hospital stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the controlgroup, and the QLQ-C30 score was higher than that in the control group(P〈0.05). The overall incidence of postoperativecomplications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopicradical resection of colorectal cancer has the advantages of small trauma and few complications, and it is more favorablefor the postoperative recovery effect and quality of life.
作者 朱盼盼 杨斌 穆少峰 姜永红 ZHU Pan-pan;YANG Bin;MU Shao-feng;JIANG Yong-hong(Oncology Surgery Department,Weinan Central Hospital,Weinan 714000,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第21期61-62,69,共3页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 结直肠癌 腹腔镜 开腹手术 胃肠功能 colorectal cancer laparoscopy laparotomy gastrointestinal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献129

  • 1陆再英,钟南山.内科学.7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:814-828.
  • 2The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopieally assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [J]. N EnglJ Med, 2004, 350(20):2050-2059.
  • 3Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoseopic resection of colon cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18(8) ~ 1163- 1185.
  • 4Smith BD,Smith GL, Hurria A,etal. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: Burdens upon an aging, changing nation[J]. J Clin Oncol,2009,27(17) :2758 - 2765.
  • 5Ware JE,Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36): Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care,1992,30(6):473 -483.
  • 6Hays RD,Sherhourne CD,Mazel R. User's manual for the Medi- cal Outcomes Study (MOS) core measures of health - related quality of life[M]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1995 : 1.
  • 7Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally impor- tant differences in EQ- 5D utility and VAS scores in cancer [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2007,5 : 70.
  • 8Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index - Cancer: De- velopment and validation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1984,2 (5) :472 - 483.
  • 9Cella DF,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure[J]. J Clin Onco1,1993,11(3) :570 - 579.
  • 10Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et a l. The European Or- ganization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ - C30: A quality - of - life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85(5):365 -376.

共引文献362

同被引文献80

引证文献9

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部