期刊文献+

儒家伦理视域下医疗决策中利益冲突之化解 被引量:5

Resolving Conflicts of Interest in Medical Decision-making from the Perspective of the Confucian Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒家伦理以仁、义、礼、智、信为主要内容,具有丰富的化解医疗决策中利益冲突的理论资源。其一,在儒家看来,医之仁道的体现是"生",当维系患者的生命权与自主权相冲突时,儒家认为生命权更具重要性和优先性。其二,儒家主张先义后利、舍利取义,这要求医生等医疗群体在遵循义的前提下求利,同时,患者也不应吝惜必要而合理的医疗支出。其三,儒家之礼的精神体现为敬、让、和。在医疗决策中,医生要敬畏生命、态度恭敬,允许患者充分表述病情,容让患者的不专业询问。为了保证全体患者的利益,"和"必须通过礼的规范来实现。其四,儒家伦理中的"信",就诚信而言,医患双方都应如实告知病情;就信任而言,患者不应无根据地怀疑医生,医生也要提高医疗水平以获取患者信任;就信仰而言,信仰医理是化解利益冲突的重要条件。其五,儒家强调"智"的变通性,医生既要具有一定的医学知识和道德观念,又要根据实际情况进行灵活变通,使之能更好地处理医疗决策中的各种问题。 Confucian ethics takes benevolence, righteousness, rites, wisdom and faith as the main contents, and has rich theoretical resources to resolve conflicts of interest in medical decision - making. Firstly, in the view of Confucianism, the embodiment of the medical treatment is "life". When the right to life of the patient is in con- flict with the right of autonomy, the Confucian believes that the right to life is more important and priority. Second- ly, Confucius advocates profit after righteousness, which requires doctors and other medical groups should pursue interests under the premise of righteousness. At the same time, patients should not begrudge the necessa^y and rea- sonable medical expenses. Thirdly, the spirit of Confucian rites is embodied in respect, comity and hamlony. In medical decision - making, doctors need to respect life, have respectful attitude, allow patients to fully express their illness, and tolerate the patient' s unprofessional inquiries. In order to ensure the interests of all patients, "hamaony" must be realized through the norms of rites. Fourthly, it is the "faith" in Confucian ethics. In terms of good faith, both doctors and patients should truthfully informed the condition ; in terms of trust, patients should not suspect doctors without any basis and doctors should improve their medical level to obtain patients' trust as well ; in terms of beliefs, believing medical knowledge is an important condition to resolve conflicts of interest. Fifthly, Con- fucianism emphasizes the flexibility of "wisdom". Doctors should not only have certain medical knowledge and mor- al concepts, but also be flexible in accordance with the actual situation so that they can better deal with various problems in medical decision -making.
作者 刘涛 LIU Tao(School of Health Management,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 511436,China)
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2018年第8期1017-1022,共6页 Chinese Medical Ethics
基金 2016年国家社科基金一般项目:医疗决策中基于权益位阶的利益冲突化解机制之研究(16BZX108)
关键词 儒家伦理 医疗决策 利益冲突 Confucian Ethics Medical Decision - making Conflicts of Interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1邱仁宗.医院的社会责任:伦理学视角[J].医学与哲学(A),2006,27(6):1-5. 被引量:51
  • 2阿兰·葛维慈.《权利与美德》( Alan Gewirth, "Rights and Virtues" ),《形而上学评论》,vol. 38 , June 1985,第739-762页.
  • 3丹尼尔·A·普特曼.《权利与德性:指向一个整体化的理论》( Daniel A. Putman, "Rights and Virtues : Toward an Integrated Theory"),《价值探索杂志》,第87-99页.
  • 4罗伯特·B·劳登.《权利的痴迷与德性的贫乏》( Robert B. Louden, "Rights Infatuation and the Impoverishment of Moral Theory" ),《价值探索杂志》,vol.17,1983,第87-102页.
  • 5罗思文.《为什么要认真对待权利?儒家的批评》,载罗纳编.《人权与世界宗教》( Leroy S. Rouner ed. , Human Rights and the World' s Religions, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988),第167-182页.
  • 6安乐哲.《以礼仪为权利-儒家的选择》,载罗纳编.《人权与世界宗教》( Leroy S. Rouner ed. , Human Rights and the World' s Religions, Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988),第199-216页.
  • 7陈汉生.《中国的刑罚与尊严》(Chad Hansen, "Punishment and Dignity in China"),载孟旦编.《个体主义与整体主义》( Donald Munro, ed. , Individualism and Holism, Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies, 1985 ),第360页.
  • 8斯坦利 I·本.《人权-为谁和为了什么》(Stanley I Benn, "Human Rights-for whom and for what?")载尤金·卡门卡和艾丽丝编.《人权》(Eugene Kamenka and Alice Erh-Soon Tay,ed. , Human Rights, New York: St. Martin' s Press, 1978) ,第72页.
  • 9费因伯格.《权利的本质和价值》(Joel Feinberg, "The Nature and Value of Rights" ),《价值探索杂志》vol.4,1970,第243-247页.
  • 10尤金·卡门卡.《一个观念的剖析》( Eugene Kamenka,"The Anatomy of an Idea" ) ,载《人权》(Eugene Kamenka and Alice Erh-Soon Tay, ed. , Human Rights, New York : St. Martin' s Press,1978),第11页.

共引文献64

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部