期刊文献+

疝环充填式 平片式与传统式疝修补术的对比研究 被引量:11

A comparative study of tension-free mesh plug or flat mesh repair and traditional repair for inguinal hernia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较疝环充填式、平片式无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果,为腹股沟疝制定合理的手术方案。方法回顾分析我院2004-2015年实施成人腹股沟疝修补术83例,按照不同的手术方式,将疝环充填式无张力疝修补术、平片无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术分别设为充填组、平片组和传统组,比较3组手术指标(手术时间、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、术后疼痛、术后牵扯感、住院费用)、术后并发症(切口感染、阴囊水肿、切口血肿、异物感、排异反应、复发)。结果充填组与平片组手术时间、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、术后疼痛较传统组短或少(P<0.05);充填组和平片组住院费用高于传统组,3组间住院费用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);传统组术后牵扯感高于充填组和平片组(P<0.05);充填组异物感高于传统组和平片组(P<0.05);其他并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论无张力疝修补术效果好、恢复较快,但是异物感和住院费用高。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of hernia ring-filling tension-free, flat-face tension-free and traditional surgical techniques in the treatment of inguinal hernia, and to develop a reasonable surgical plan for patients with inguinal hernia.Methods Eighty-three patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair surgeries in our hospital from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups, based on the differences on surgical methods: the hernia ring-filling group, the flat-face tension-free group and traditional hernia repair group. A number of surgical parameters, including operation time, length of hospitalization, postoperative off-bed time, postoperative pain, postoperative muscle dragging effects, and hospitalization costs were compared. Postoperative complications, including incisional infection, scrotal edema, incisional hematoma, foreign body sensation, rejection, and recurrence were analyzed for all three groups.Results Compared with the traditional group, the operation duration, length of hospitalization, postoperative off-bed time and postoperative pain in the hernia ring-filling group and the flat-face tension-free group were significantly shorter or less than those in the traditional group ( P 〈0.05). The hospitalization costs for the hernia ring-filling group and the flat-face tension-free group were significantly higher than those of the traditional group. The differences in hospitalization costs among the three groups were statistically significant ( P 〈0.05). The traditional group had higher postoperative muscle dragging effect than the other two groups ( P 〈0.05). The foreign body sensation effect in the hernia ring-filling group was significantly higher than that of the other two groups ( P 〈0.05). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications among the three groups ( P 〉0.05).Conclusion The tension-free hernia repair surgery techniques achieved great clinical efficacy with shorter recovery time, but patients experienced higher foreign body sensation effects and their hospitalization costs are significantly higher than that of the traditional method. The choices of using which technique is to be decided in a case-by-case manner.
作者 夷泽君 朱伟为 李建军 吴爱玲 Yi Zejun;Zhu Weiwei;Li Jianjun;Wu Ailing(Department of Surgery,Jiajiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Sichuan 614100,China)
出处 《山西医药杂志》 CAS 2018年第13期1487-1491,共5页 Shanxi Medical Journal
基金 四川省医院管理和发展研究中心科研项目(SCYG2017-40)
关键词 腹股沟 疝修补术 对比研究 Hernia inguinal Herniorrhaphy Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1许剑民,钟芸诗,任黎,韦烨,赖衍翰.无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝中的应用价值[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(8):580-581. 被引量:36
  • 2肖乾虎,张跃天.如何处理无张力疝修补手术后复发疝[J].临床外科杂志,2006,14(11):693-694. 被引量:26
  • 3SCHMEDT CG, SAUERLAND S, BITTNER R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surz Endosc, 2009. 19(2): 188-199.
  • 4COLLABORATION EH. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 87(7): 860-867.
  • 5HALLEN M, BERGENFELZ A, WESTERDAHL J. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term fonow-up of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surgery, 2008, 143(3): 313-317.
  • 6Awad SS, Fagan SP. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair[ J]. Am J Surg, 2004,188(6A Suppl) :9S- 16S.
  • 7Haapaniemi S, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, et al. Reoperation after recur- rent groin hernia repair[ J]. Ann Surg, 2001,234( 1 ) :122 -126.
  • 8Rutkow IM. The PerFix plug repair for groin hernias [ J ]. Surg Clin North Am, 2003,83(5) :1079 - 1098.
  • 9邓玉芝,马庆海,林海波,等.疝环充填式和平片式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝临床疗效对比[J].中国当代医药,2010,17(7):256-258.
  • 10熊勤涛.传统疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用体会[J].脑床和实验医学杂志,2011,10(16):154-156.

共引文献250

同被引文献61

引证文献11

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部