期刊文献+

分期经皮冠状动脉介入术完全血运重建对高危非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征多支血管病变患者预后的影响 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较分期与一次经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)完全血运重建对高危非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)多支血管病变患者预后的影响。方法:根据完全血运重建策略的不同将高危NSTE-ACS患者分为分期PCI组(n=128)和一次PCI组(n=58),比较两组治疗和主要并发症的情况;患者术后随访12个月,比较两组主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率。结果:分期PCI组主要并发症发生率显著低于一次PCI组(6.25%对15.51%,P=0.042)。随访至术后3个月,分期PCI组MACE的发生率较一次PCI组显著降低(P<0.05),随访至术后12个月,分期PCI组MACE的发生率较一次PCI组有降低趋势,但差异无统计学意义。结论:分期PCI完全血运重建安全有效,可作为高危NSTE-ACS多支血管病变患者优先选用的介入治疗策略。
出处 《国际心血管病杂志》 2018年第4期248-251,共4页 International Journal of Cardiovascular Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1魏常华,袁建军,朱好辉.实时三维超声心动图评价冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室收缩同步性及心功能的早期改变[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(11):2345-2353. 被引量:4
  • 2王岱.急性非ST抬高心肌梗死28例临床分析[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2005,22(2):132-133. 被引量:3
  • 3孙艺红,胡大一,闰明珠.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征的预后危险因素与危险评分[J].中国循环杂志,2006,21(1):8-11. 被引量:34
  • 4Brannwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable anginaand non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction22summary article :a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina.)[S].IJACC, 2002,40(7) :1366.
  • 5Sea Hing Ong, IMBBS (Malaya), MRCP (UK), Victor YT Lim,2MB ChB (Glas), FRCP (Edin), FESC, Boon Cheng Chang,3MBBS (Aust), MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol), Jayaram ingamanaicker,3MBBS (Madras), MRCP (UK), FACC (USA), Chong Hiok Tan,3MBChb, MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol),Yew Seong Goh,3MBBS, MRCP (UK), Kok Soon Tan,3MBBCh (Dublin), MRCP (UK), FRCP (Edin) Three-Year Experience of Primary Percutaneous Goronary Intervention for AcuteST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Hospital without On-site CardiacSurgery[J]. Ann Aead Med Singapore,2009,38:1085-1090.
  • 6Knot J, Kala P, Rokyta R, et al. Comparison of outcomes in ST-segment depression and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with emergency PCI: data from a multicentre registry[J]. Cardiovasc J Aft, 2012, 23(9): 495-500.
  • 7Palmerini T, Caixela A, Generiux P, et al. Comparison of clinical and angiographic prognostic risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2012, 163(3): 383-391.
  • 8Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000, 284(7): 835-842.
  • 9Boersma E, Pieoer KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment slevation. Results from an international trial of 9 461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators[J]. Circulation, 2000, 101(22): 2557-2567.
  • 10Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2003, 163(19): 2345-2353.

共引文献15

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部