期刊文献+

批判性思维在工程教育中的价值及其运用 被引量:9

The Value and Implementation of Critical Thinking in Engineering Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判性思维是人们综合运用形式逻辑和非形式逻辑及其它相关技能对观点、判断、命题、论证及方案等一阶思维进行二阶评估的复合型思维工具。当前工程专业人才培养过程中凸显的问题意识淡薄、专业兴趣不浓、创新能力缺乏及实践能力不强等问题,都与批判性思维在工程教育中的缺失有关。批判性思维有助于工程教育重塑教学目标,回归教育本质;有助于改革工程教育内容,实现思维工具与专业知识间的深层结构性融合,建立发展性的、整体性的知识观;有助于促进工程教育"供给侧"改革,推动"卓越工程师教育培养计划",促进工程人才培养模式与国际接轨。从工程教育的教学目标、教学方法、课程设置及教学评价等多个环节入手,实现批判性思维工具与工程专业人才培养的有效结合,增强学生的信息通晓与分辨、问题提出与剖析、风险识别与处理、方案论证与完善等核心能力,从而提升工程教育质量。 Critical thinking is a kind of compound thinking tool,where formal logic,informal logic and other related skills are applied to the second-order evaluation of first-order thinking such as viewpoints,judgments,arguments,projects,and the like.The lack of question consciousness and professional interesting,the weakness of ability of innovation and practice,or some other problems like those in engineering personnel training at present,are all related with absence of critical thinking in engineering education.With the help of critical thinking,the goal of engineering education will be remolded,returning to its essence;the content of engineering education will be reformed,merging the thinking tool and professional knowledge together,and building the developing and holistic view of knowledge;the supply-side reform of engineering education and the program for educating and training excellent engineers will be pushed forward,brought in line with international standards.For the sake of improving the quality of engineering education,the tool of critical thinking should be integrated effectively with professional engineering personnel training,to enhance students' ability of knowing and distinguishing information,raising and analyzing questions,recognizing and handling risk,and demonstrating and improving projects.
作者 李娜 王日升
出处 《高教发展与评估》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期9-18,78,共11页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
基金 山东省高等学校人文社会科学计划项目"山东省大学生批判性思维素质现状分析与对策"(J16YA02) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学计划(思政专项)"新媒体时代大学生网络意见领袖的正向引导作用调查研究"(J17ZZ80) 山东交通学院教研教改基金资助项目"港口航道与海岸工程专业教学的改革研究"(JG201312)
关键词 批判性思维 工程教育 人才培养 教育改革 评估性思维 critical thinking engineering education personal training educational reform evaluational thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献84

  • 1杨琳.大工程观背景下大学生科技创新与工程素质的培养[J].江苏高教,2006(2):100-102. 被引量:38
  • 2约翰·S.布鲁贝克(王承绪,等译).高等教育哲学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社.2001.81.
  • 3德里克·博克.回归大学之道--对美国大学本科教育的反思与展望[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.56.
  • 4A.爱因斯坦 L·英费尔德.物理学的进化[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1962.66.
  • 5拾景炎.唤回学生的提问权.中国教育报,2003,2:21.
  • 6James J. F. Forest and Kevin Kinser. Higher education in theUnited States : an encyclopedia [ M ]. Santa Barbara,Califor-nia: ABC. CLIO,Inc. 2002.
  • 7Enoch Stephen Hale. Project Demonstrating Excellence: Acritical analysis of Richard Paul ’ s substantive trans 一 discipli-nary conception of critical thinking [ D]. Union Institute & U-niversity ,2008.
  • 8J. H Newman. The idea of a university[ M]. New Haven,CT:Yale University Press, 1996 ( Original work published 1899).
  • 9Debbie Walsh and Richard W. Paul. The Goal of CriticalThinking:from Educational Ideal to Educational Reality [ EB/OL]. American Federation of Teachers, Washington, D. C.,1986. http://www. eric. ed. gov/PDFS/ED295916. pdf 2010-09-30.
  • 10CaliforniaState University issued Executive Order 338,Gener-al Education - Breadth Requirements ( 1980 ) . http://www.calstate. edu/eo/EO - 338. pdf. 2010 -09 - 30.

共引文献78

同被引文献47

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部